The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 3 of 18)

p> Dirty Republican Lies. Let's see an uproar about this... br> -- J.W.E. /p> p> I know The Spectator is not an unbiased organization, but you now are just as bad as Dan Rather and Rather Gate (as you call it). What a bunch of hypocrites!!! I hated what CBS did, and I thought you were better than to spread the same lies about Democrats! Well, are you going to "retire" now that the truth is out about the Schiavo Memo? Are you going to apologize to the Democrats you falsely named as creating that piece of garbage? My guess is no. I don't expect you to be fair, but you could be decent and do a little "reporting" (not sure anyone knows what that is anymore) and get your facts straight before blaming innocent people! Are you going to do a follow up about Sen. Martinez? His staffer? I doubt it -- that would be too decent. br> -- Dawn Merwin , a one time Spectator reader br> Magnolia, Texas /p> p> Your March 24 article on the Schiavo "talking points" memo concludes, "But there is no evidence that the talking points were a Martinez staff product." Now that Sen. Martinez's aide Brian Darling has publicly admitted that he wrote the memo and resigned, I hope you will print a retraction of the allegations of Democratic hoaxing and apologize to all the news organizations that got the story right from the beginning. Don't believe everything you read in the "blogosphere."

topics:
Education, Business, Religion, Catholicism, Global Warming, Hollywood, Law, Supreme Court, Founding Fathers, Russia, NATO, Africa