The American Spectator

Reader Mail

p> CASEY QUESTIONED br> Re: Marc Farinella's letter ("Casey for Senate") in Reader Mail's Not So Fast : /p>

Does Mr. Farinella really expect Pennsylvania voters to accept at face value his denials and question the accuracy of The American Spectator's report in light of the fact that the very sort of deception it describes has been part and parcel of the Democratic Party's campaign strategy since the 1980s? Does Mr. Farinella assume that pro-life voters are not aware of the number of 2004 Democratic primary candidates for President ran as pro-life candidates early in their careers only to side with pro-abortion forces once elected than suddenly adopt the positions and language of the pro-abortion lobby when they ran for high office?

As a pro-life, social conservative from a strongly Democratic family who switched to the Republican Party because of these issues I don't believe any truly sincere pro-life, pro-family person could be comfortable associated with the single largest pro-abortion, pro-gay organization in the nation. Before The American Spectator's report I had already assumed that Bob Casey's positions on these issues were nothing by convenient deceptions just as they have been for every other Pennsylvania Democrat past and present who adopts them when running in races where such positions are a necessity, while under the umbrella of an organization that actively promotes the wanton destruction of innocent life.

p>Misters Farinella and Casey, I've been deceived by so called "pro-life" and "pro-family" Democrats in the past and it will never happen again. br> -- Paul S. Galvanek br> Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania /p> p> SECURING SECURITY

topics:
Education, Social Security, Medicaid, Abortion, Environment, Law, Military, Iraq