The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Special Report

Price Control Pills

The exploding costs of Bush's Medicare drug benefits are eliciting socialistic responses.

(Page 2 of 2)

The researchers figure the forgoing regulation cumulatively cut R&D by $188 billion through 2001. That cost 140 million life years and, depending on how one values human life, up to $21 trillion.

Had government more consciously restricted prices, say limiting drug prices to the consumer price index in 1980, between $265 billion and $293 billion of R&D would have been lost--almost one-third of actual industry expenditures. That would have knocked 330 to 365 drugs out of the market, with huge economic and human losses.

Transforming Medicare into a price control system would generate even higher costs. Say Giaccotto, Santerre, and Vernon: "The impact of price controls on Medicare drug purchases would be significantly greater in a much shorter period of time because they are deeper and because they would affect a larger segment of the pharmaceutical market and would send a negative signal to the hundreds of biotechnology firms that as yet have no revenues and that rely upon venture capital and pharmaceutical firm investment to sustain R&D activities."

The researchers figure the result would be a $372 billion or 40 percent drop in R&D outlays. That would mean a loss of 277 million life years.

How much should drugs cost? There is no right answer. Government will inevitably influence the marketplace, if nothing else through moral suasion and the possibility of political action.

Far worse, however, would be for government to promote price controls, whether enacted formally by legislation or implemented informally through market control. Warn Giaccotto, Santerre, and Vernon: "While the federal government's success in exerting downward pressure on real drug prices may have benefited consumers in the short run, because lower drug prices improve access to existing pharmaceuticals, this influence has undoubtedly come at the cost of reduced levels of pharmaceutical innovation."

The Medicare drug benefit has set a dangerous trap, tempting Washington politicians to try to force the pharmaceutical industry to provide more drugs for less money. Alas, there ain't no free lunch, whether in pharmaceuticals or life. If the federal government regulates drug prices, Americans will pay with their health and lives.

Page:   12

topics:
Trade, Health Care, John McCain, Medicaid, Medicare

About the Author

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the Senior Fellow in International Religious Persecution at the Institute on Religion and Public Policy. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics (Crossway).

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Doug Bandow

More Articles From Special Report

http://spectator.org/archives/2005/02/15/price-control-pills

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

A Tsunami of Bad Economics

Ryan Young | 5.23.12

Nobody Pushed Tyler Clementi

Ross Kaminsky | 5.23.12

Ted Kennedy's Anti-Mormon Moment

Daniel Allott | 5.23.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT