By Paul Beston on 2.14.05 @ 12:08AM
Arthur Miller's best play will endure beyond its social context, and perhaps his own intentions.
"Great drama is great questions," Arthur Miller wrote, "or it is
nothing but technique."
He was right, but his counsel had become a lonely one by the
second half of his career. In many ways, the American theater has
returned to what it was before Eugene O'Neill, Tennessee Williams
and Miller arrived -- light entertainment. Even today's dramas,
more often than not, tend to confirm fashionable points of view
while pretending to be shocking or politically daring. One thinks
of Six Degrees of Separation, among others.
Great questions extend beyond place and time, and Miller's
greatest play, Death of a Salesman, shows every sign of
doing so. When it appeared in 1949, it was widely viewed as a
critique of American notions of success, and that is still the
widely preferred interpretation. But I wonder how much longer such
a view can endure.
Death of a Salesman does portray the harshness and
impersonality of the American business world; when Willy Loman
can't make money anymore, his company discards him. He discovers
that he "is worth more dead than alive," in the form of a life
insurance policy. Though he is about to make the final payment on
his home, he is nearly penniless. The play declares that Willy's
success ethic is a fraud. As his older son Biff says, "he had the
wrong dreams, all, all wrong."
But what were those dreams? Willy believes, essentially, in
get-rich quick schemes founded on nothing more than personality. He
raises his sons to believe in the power of personality and being
not just liked, but "well liked." For him, all success is about
exteriors, about one-upping the next guy, about being, as his
younger son Happy puts it, "number-one man." Biff is good looking,
athletic and popular in school, and his father encourages him to
exploit these qualities to the exclusion of all others, including
basic ethics. Biff becomes a chronic thief with a deeply ingrained
sense of entitlement, unprepared for an economic world that demands
merit beyond personality.
Next door, Willy's neighbor Charlie raises a son, Bernard, very
differently. Bernard is awkward and un-athletic; he does not have
any of Biff's easy charm. But he gets good grades and becomes an
attorney. Near the end of the play, he is preparing to argue a case
before the Supreme Court.
The ruthless American economic system rewards Bernard, who
sacrifices and plays by the rules, and rejects Biff, who never
applies himself and expects special treatment at every turn. At
least in regard to the sons, the American dream seems to have
played more than fair.
As for Willy, on a basic human level, we feel sympathy for his
suffering, but beyond that it is not readily apparent why we must
accept his wife's famous admonition that "attention must be paid."
The man is an incurable blusterer whose hollowness is apparent to
most of his customers, even in his glory days. At play's end, he is
a broken man less because he sacrificed himself to an inhumane
system than because he was never honest with himself or his
family.
Miller seems to have meant for the audience to associate Willy's
dreams with America, but most of us have counter examples to Willy
readily at hand, often in our own homes. Miller even supplies one
himself in the person of Charlie. The play is famous for supposedly
exposing the falsity of the American promise; what a strange,
self-defeating approach it takes to this task. Could it be that the
play's enduring relevance lies elsewhere?
More than 50 years after the play opened, we're all salesmen
now. Entrepreneurs and small businesses abound in America, and even
office workers are encouraged to think of themselves independently,
to approach each new position as a means of enhancing their own
individual "brand." Instruction books and guides to personal
success are everywhere. Many are superficial, but most offer
sensible, if obvious, advice. Few that I know of encourage people
to develop a sense of entitlement or double standards, or to
believe that a "smile and a shoeshine" alone will advance them very
far.
I don't imagine that many men believed this in 1949, either.
Death of a Salesman endures because of its portrayal of
the destruction wrought by self-delusion and dishonesty, and the
way these forces weave their way through a family. "We never told
the truth in this house, not for ten minutes!" Biff exclaims near
the end.
We all know something about that, don't we? Therein lies the
play's real legacy, and Miller's.
topics:
Business, Books, Supreme Court