By P. David Hornik on 2.1.05 @ 12:09AM
Some prove to be overtly anti-American and anti-Semitic. Then what?
JERUSALEM -- It will take time before we know the real
implications of the Iraqi elections and how things will work out in
that troubled country. At least we know, though, that the elections
weren't won by a radical, anti-Semitic, anti-American movement.
Unfortunately, one can't say the same about the recent elections
in Gaza, which were swept by Hamas -- an organization whose charter
states:
Israel will exist and will continue to exist until
Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before
it.… There is no solution for the Palestinian question except
through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences
are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.… Jihad is [our]
path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of [our]
wishes.
And last April at a memorial service in Syria for Gazan Hamas
leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi, assassinated by Israel the previous
month, Hamas political chief Khaled Mashal said: "[Hamas's] battle
is with two sides. One of them is the strongest power in the world,
the United States, and the second is the strongest power in the
region [Israel]."
Rantisi himself, in a 2003 article published on a Hamas website
called "Why Shouldn't We Attack the United States?," wrote that for
Hamas, attacking America was not only "a moral and national
duty-but above all, a religious one."
Hamas already seems to be acting on that "duty." As Erick
Stakelbeck noted last September 24 in the New York Sun,
"On August 20, Hamas money man Ismail Elbarasse was arrested after
authorities witnessed his wife videotaping Maryland's Chesapeake
Bay Bridge from their SUV as Mr. Elbarasse drove. The images
captured by Mr. Elbarasse's wife included close-ups of cables and
other features 'integral to the structural integrity of the
bridge,' according to court papers.… in an FBI affidavit
filed in Mr. Elbarrasse's case, agent Shawn Devroude stated that Al
Qaeda has been enlisting Hamas members to conduct surveillance of
American targets."
Last week in Gaza, Hamas won 77 out of 118 seats in municipal
elections for ten towns. Hamas, when not engaging in suicide
bombings and other terrorist activity, doubles as a social agency
in Gaza and the West Bank that runs schools, kindergartens, and
clinics. Indeed, last month Hamas scored a big win in West Bank
municipal elections as well.
These results are seen by some as a blow to PA chairman Mahmoud
Abbas's comparatively secular-nationalist Fatah movement. As
loudspeakers blared in Gaza while thousands of Hamas supporters
celebrated in the streets, "The Hamas victory proves that Islam is
the only solution."
Under Yasser Arafat's corrupt oligarchy, Hamas gained popularity
for its "clean" image as a strictly Islamic movement dedicated to
the people's welfare. But its terror activities endeared it to the
public as well. Indeed, in Beit Hanoun, a town in northern Gaza
that Hamas members had been using to fire Kassam rockets into
Israel, Hamas won 11 of the 13 seats. As Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar
said of the elections, "This means that the people believe in the
armed resistance as the only option."
These developments cast a shadow over both Prime Minister
Sharon's disengagement plan and President Bush's road map.
According to the disengagement plan, Israel is supposed to withdraw
completely from Gaza (and part of the northern West Bank) this
summer, under the assumption that removal of the Israeli presence
will turn people's minds to everyday affairs of building their
society and improving their lives. But a neighbor seething in
anti-Israeli hatred is more likely to be a source of intensified
missile attacks and terror incursions that will make life in the
nearby Israeli towns and communities unbearable.
EVEN MORE OMINOUSLY, Hamas in Gaza could take a leaf from the book
of its sister terror organization, Hezbollah in Lebanon. Since
Israel's withdrawal from that border in 2000, Hezbollah has kept
things relatively quiet while building an arsenal of 13,000
Iranian-supplied missiles that now hold all of northern Israel and
part of central Israel in their sights. Similarly, superficial
"progress toward peace" on the road map could lead eager Israeli
and American leaders to ignore or downplay a comparable buildup in
Gaza; the result would be an Israel so hemmed in by enemy weaponry
that it could best be described as "ripe for the kill."
If such a scenario seems speculative, a January 30 AP story
called "Hamas, Hezbollah Agree to Uphold Resistance against Israel"
gives it teeth. After a meeting between the above-mentioned Hamas
leader, Khaled Mashal, and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in the
latter's office in Beirut, a Hezbollah announcement said the two
organizations had "agreed to uphold the resistance option against
Israel despite U.S. pressure." And as Mashal told reporters after
the meeting, "We are partners in this march of confronting a common
enemy. In the same way south Lebanon was liberated, we have hope
that all of Palestine will be liberated."
Mashal added, "The resistance program is making progress in
various fields … winning the support and confidence of our
Palestinian people inside [the Palestinian areas]."
The Palestinian Authority is, of course, nominally under the
control of Abbas, whom people try hard to view as a moderate
despite his Holocaust denial, record as Arafat's right-hand man in
planning and funding terror attacks for four decades, and vows
never to give up the "right of return" that would destroy Israel
demographically. But Abbas's ongoing efforts to work out a modus
vivendi with Hamas and the other terror organizations -- instead of
confronting them and confiscating their weapons as mandated by the
road map -- suggest his aim is, like Arafat before him, to find
ways to work with them as part of a grand strategy.
Whether or not pro-Western moderacy will prevail in Iraq, it has
not yet even dawned in the Palestinian Authority. If Israeli and
American leaders overlook the strength and key role there of Hamas
and Islamic radicalism, they do so to both their countries'
peril.
topics:
Islam, Iraq, Iran, Israel