The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Special Report

Grammar for Smarties

The popularity of "Why Oh Why" books prove we’re serious about the care of our language.

One of the smaller, but no less bloody skirmishes in the Culture War is being waged on the linguistic front. For those new to the field there are essentially two camps: one made up of linguists, lexicographers, academics or language liberals; the other of conservatives or prescriptivists, the so-called "linguistic luddites." The conservative's anguish over the decline of the English language, the linguists charge, is no different than his distress over the decline of culture in general. This "whining," writes linguist Alan Pagliere, is a mix of nostalgia, self-righteousness, and ignorance of the reality of the laws governing and of the myriad variables involved in language change.

Indeed, the battle cry of the language liberal might be, "Languages change. Get over it." Most linguists judge that language change is neither good nor bad, and, anyway, resistance is futile. Languages, like hemlines, will change whether we want them to or not. This indifference to standards is reflected in the latest editions of our popular dictionaries in which words that are commonly misspelled (alright) or misused (disinterested) have been given the lexicographer's stamp of approval.

Yet despite all this talk of transformation the mother tongue has gone remarkably unchanged since the King James Version of the Bible began to stabilize the language in the mid-seventeenth century. Words come and go, yes, but a letter written 367 years ago by John Milton to Benedetto Bonomatthai reads much like one composed by a good writer today:

I am inclined to believe that when the language in common use in any country becomes irregular and depraved, it is followed by their ruin or their degradation.

Now note the dissimilarity between the writing of Chaucer and Shakespeare after a mere 225 years.

p>Chaucer: em>Whanne that April with his shoures sote br> The droughte of March hath perced to the rote. /em> /p> p>Shakespeare: em>Weary with toil, I haste me to my bed, br> The dear repose for limbs with travel tired; /em> /p>
Page: 1 2  

topics:
Education, Business, Books, Constitution, Law, Oil

About the Author

Christopher Orlet writes every Thursday from St. Louis.

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Christopher Orlet

More Articles From Special Report

http://spectator.org/archives/2005/01/11/grammar-for-smarties

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

A Tsunami of Bad Economics

Ryan Young | 5.23.12

Nobody Pushed Tyler Clementi

Ross Kaminsky | 5.23.12

Ted Kennedy's Anti-Mormon Moment

Daniel Allott | 5.23.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT