12.3.04 @ 12:01AM
Re: Sam Dealey’s Where Is My Camel:
Beautifully done, very funny story there by Sam Dealey. Really nice.
His cockpit visit also reminded me of a similar experience I
once had flying to Malta on Air Malta because, despite that less
raffish and better run airlines like Air France and Lufthansa
service the country, silly me wanted the whole “authentic” Maltese
experience from the very flight out of London. As soon as we were
airborne, two-thirds of the other passengers, who were all male
save for my companion on the trip, lit up. As did one of the flight
attendants. It was thus a rough flight, only made worse by the
single worst airline meal I’ve ever had in my life, which is really
— Richard Szathmary
Re: S. T. Karnick’s Cures That Don’t Kill:
Stem cells that are working come not only from “adult” stem
cells, but stem cell taken from the umbilical cord after the birth
of the baby. How ironic, a live birth is required as opposed to
destroying the life of an embryo.
— Adriel Lam
LOW RENT U.N.
Re: R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.’s A U.N. Prodigy:
As someone who takes a backseat to nobody when it comes to
contempt for the U.N., I still find myself troubled about the
recent “revelation” about Kojo Annan’s payments from Cotecna. If
this is truly a bribe for services rendered, doesn’t it suggest
that bribes to U.N. officials are remarkably cost effective? After
all, compared to the billions involved here, $2,500 a month for a
few years seems truly paltry.
— Rick Skeean
The story that Kofi Annan’s U.N. was running an Oil Bribes for
Protection racket in Iraq was out long before the 2004 Election,
but only now is its embarrassing inevitability reaching the
Obsolescent Media. But the best is yet to come for George Bush in
this; for Team Kerry and the Dems could not have been clearer in
their opposition to the Iraq war and in their assertion that only
the U.N.’s multi-lateralism could deal with such international
issues; and that, in such, we needed to regain the respect of our
“allies.” But now the facts are eking out. The players not only
include Annan Père et Fils, as well as U.N. Members who sold
their votes opposing military sanctions against Saddam Hussein in
return for payoffs, but also now the name of Mr. Marc Rich,
distinguished Swiss Resident and Clinton Pardonee, has surfaced in
the midst of middlemanning a crooked deal. That is not the creative
team of Saturday Night Live leading Democratic Strategy.
Nor is it the moles of the evil “George Bush Deserves a Great
Inaugural Party” insurgents. That actually is what has become of
Harry Truman’s party in daily conference with the ghost of Dr.
— Gene Wright
Laguna Niguel, California
THE STEM OF THE ISSUE
Re: Tom Bethell’s Mengele Medicine:
Mr. Tom Bethell might be interested in reading a thread on an Irish political discussion board in which I have referred readers to his article on “Mengele Medicine” and have gotten back lots of bricks and rotten tomatoes!
The thread starts here.
I don’t know if I am doing a good job in handling his side of
the argument or not!
— Tom F.
THE FULL FORCE OF THE LAW
Re: James Bowman’s Wise Guys:
James Bowman, in his commentary entitled “Wise Guys,” leads to the conclusion that, in sports today, “it’s time to bring back shame for all sorts of bad sportsmanship.” On the face of it, I couldn’t agree more. Yet despite his appeal that he not “be thought an apologist for poor sportsmanship,” Mr. Bowman spends the rest of his commentary so completely missing the point regarding the Pacer incident involving Ron Artest and teammates that, ultimately, he cannot be thought of as anything else but.
With all due respect for Mr. Bowman’s position as a “resident scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center,” he apparently has yet to learn the definition of “poor sportsmanship.” Ron Artest and teammates were not exhibiting “poor sportsmanship” during their now-famous rampage through the stands. They were, in fact, exhibiting criminal behavior and, more specifically, they were perpetrating the crime of assault and battery. Legally speaking, beer throwing and verbally abusive comments, even by drunken and disgustingly inappropriate fans, are not provocation enough to justify physically assaulting even the perpetrators themselves, much less innocent victims who merely happened to be seated in the vicinity. Should Mr. Bowman disagree with this assessment of what constitutes criminal behavior, perhaps he should punch out a few innocent folks sometime and discover how the criminal justice system reacts to those of us who are not over-pampered, multi-millionaire athletes.
I, for one, didn’t need arcane statistics regarding the number of unsportsmanlike British football players removed from games over the years to tell me that team sports, both collegiate and professional, have grown increasingly violent during the course of my life. That is precisely why I have been boycotting sports for the last twenty years. I refuse to economically subsidize people who are actually stupid enough to commit felony assault on nationwide television over something as inconsequential as a sporting event. Beyond that, the greedy folks who pay those criminals million dollar salaries for playing a game and who subsequently make tens of millions from this don’t get a dime of my money either. I’m afraid that their utter unmindfulness about the negative effect that violence in sports has upon our nation’s children just doesn’t sell well with me. Violence does indeed sell, to be sure, but until organized sports stops parading common criminals like Ron Artest and Mike Tyson across my TV screen, they simply have no product of value they can market to my family. Neither do their advertisers.
The revenue inherent in the sports world today certainly
contributes to its ever-more-violent nature, but moral relativists
like Mr. Bowman must also share a big part of the blame. To suggest
that the “outpouring of criticism” over the Pacer incident was
“just a little overblown” is to further sanction such activity, as
is his attempt to delude us into believing that what we all saw in
the news coverage of the incident was merely “unsportsmanlike” as
opposed to criminal conduct. Thankfully, the prosecuting attorney
of Auburn Hills is not as self-delusional as Mr. Bowman, and Ron
Artest will now face criminal charges just like you or I would.
Finally, some accountability! Never once in his commentary did Mr.
Bowman refer to the criminality of Artest’s actions and, regarding
the “loyalty” that led Artest’s apparently unintelligent teammates
to join him in televised criminal mayhem, well, he’s “not at all
sure that it is warped.” Excuse me? Since when do we support team
loyalty over civilized behavior? Until team owners, college
coaches, media pundits, academicians like Mr. Bowman and the
players themselves actually learn to differentiate between poor
sportsmanship and criminality, sports will continue it’s descent
into ever-more meaninglessness commercial barbarism. Gee, what ever
happened to: “It matters not whether you win or loose, but how you
play the game?”
— Thomas Donley
A DIFFERENCE OF 15
Re: Christopher Orlet’s Gene, Gene the Running Machine:
Wow! Christopher Orlet finds the 15 I.Q. point differential (or greater) between whites and blacks “slight,” despite the hundreds of millions of subjects of each race so tested?
That “slight” difference engenders such trivial manifestations as, on the one hand, nuclear fission, moon-landings and Rule of Law or, on the other, never inventing the wheel or a written language.
I hate to be critical of a fellow conservative, but his
politically-correct dismissal of what is an ENORMOUS disparity,
with endless consequences for public policy, is only a slight
improvement over the modern-day Lysenkoists of the left.
— Earl Holt III
St. Louis, Missouri
Re: Jeremie Arthur’s Judges Ambush Military Recruiters:
A couple of thoughts about Jeremie Arthur’s very provocative special report — one comment philosophical, the other political.
From a philosophical standpoint, as has often been noted (especially since 9/11), it is not the college professor who guarantees the existence of the Academic (or any other) Freedom that we enjoy. The guarantor of our Freedom is the soldier who serves in our ALL VOLUNTEER force ready to put (and currently putting) himself or herself in harm’s way in our defense. Thus the hypocritical behavior of the elitist scum at colleges and universities who would deny student access to military recruiters for our ALL VOLUNTEER force is best described with one word: despicable.
From a political standpoint, recent election results suggest that those of a Red State persuasion may finally be approaching the point where they are at last fed up with this nauseating nitpicking, notably on the part of emotionally retarded Cry Baby Boom elitists who dominate academia (especially schools of journalism, law and education), Hollywood, the so called “news” media, and our out of control, power corrupted Federal Judiciary. Those black robed mandarins who demand that we of the unwashed address them as “Your Honor” (but are in fact our shame) from their grand perch high atop the bench may at last discover that their power is not absolute — that there may be some real By God consequences. Given that the checks and balances that were INTENDED by our founders to keep the Court in a subservient (i.e., useful) position — rather than the tyrannical monster it is fast becoming — have all but disappeared under a torrent of self-perpetuating decisions by the judicial elite, these haughty arrogant tyrants may learn anew the meaning of the motto of the Commonwealth of Virginia: Sic Semper Tyrannis…and of the accompanying picture of the bloody sword. My surmise, and it is only a wild guess, is that it would take no more than the mounting of ten million bumper stickers of a particular sort — with arrest and incarceration for civil disobedience that would surely follow — to blow out our wretched courts and overwhelm our limited jail capacity.
What sort, one might ask? Well, just for instance, “Resurrect
Justice — Elevate a Judge” punctuated with the drawing of a noose.
I would further surmise it would not take some 21st century Nathan
Bedford Forrest to breathe life into a now dormant, but newly
ethnically diverse Ku Klux Klan (torching not crosses but judicial
activists and law school professors) for the elite to get the
message. At some point, one may suppose the level of outrage will
rise sufficiently to ignite action on the part of ordinary,
peaceable, working people determined to restore the benefits a once
decent society, benefits that include a subservient, efficient
system of justice that actually serves the people who pay the
freight. Meanwhile, we shall continue to suffer passively as best
we can until critical mass is achieved and the tyranny of the
power-corrupted judiciary can be closed upon and engaged —
decisively. Until then, we shall remain in what might be thought of
as the “target identification” phase.
— Thomas E. Stuart
Public School Teacher (and Vietnam veteran)
I remember cases in law school where clubs, mostly country clubs,
were denied exclusionary privileges if they were granted liquor
licenses from the state. The theory was that the license gave the
clubs the sanction of government, and therefore, a club could not
exclude membership without the threat of losing its license. It
seems that these rulings should control where law schools receive
funding from the state (in my opinion, even more so as a license
paid for should have fewer conditions attached than monetary
grants). So, under the Solomon Amendment, the schools, whether or
private, should be free to exercise their discretion to not allow
military recruiters, and the federal government should “restrict
the provision of federal funds to institutions of higher education
that prohibit or effectively prevent recruiters from the nation’s
military services from having equal access to students for the
purposes of military recruiting.” Simple, right?
— Ted Lang
Re: David Hogberg’s More Bad News for Dems:
It seems that people turn conservative more than liberal as they
age except for those who do not, are unable, or refuse to grow up.
Idealism is a great trait but without a sense of realistic
practicality for implementation it just seems childish. If my
hypothesis is correct than the overall demographics do not favor
the regional, minority party known as the Democrats. Add to this
conservative trend the increasing failure of the traditional
Democrat campaign scare tactics to gain voters’ support and it does
get scary for them but not as scary as seeing Michael Moore clean
shaven in a suit.
— Diamon Sforza
San Diego, California
Sign up for our weekly newsletter:
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
By John Corry
By Mark Steyn
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
By Mark Steyn
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
By Brit Hume
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2013, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.