Has there ever been a president whose second term got off to
such a fast start? Washington wisdom would have Bush 2.0 in
beta-testing, developing nuanced policies and bringing the
President’s opponents into the cabinet to assure policy “balance.”
This would, of course, preclude much of anything from happening to
disturb Washington, the U.N., or the EUnuchs in the next four
years. In the immortal words of Mr. Soprano, fuhgeddaboudit.
President Bush is a man in a hurry.
President Bush nominated Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales
to replace Colin Powell and John Ashcroft before their
predecessors’ chairs cooled. (Note to the New York Times:
If Big Dog Don Rumsfeld were going, he’d already be gone.) Our
impatient Mr. Bush didn’t wait for Chilean police to sort out their
problems with his Secret Service detail. He waded into a scuffle,
grabbed Secret Service agent Nick Trotta by the lapel, and dragged
him past the overly enthusiastic Chileans. (Can you imagine the
ribbing Trotta’s pals are giving him now? Imagine a lifetime of
brave service being remembered only for the moment the President
dove into the shoving contest to protect his bodyguard.) After
extracting poor Trotta, the President straightened his cuffs and
got on to bidness. From the way Dubya is rushing around, you’d
think we were at war.
The Dems and Euro-libs are comforting themselves with the idea
that America is overextended, and not capable of tackling the rest
of the challenges that face us. But what they don’t understand is
that this president hasn’t slacked the pace, and isn’t going to be
shy about pulling the levers of America that will change the world
— and us — between now and 2008. The cabinet shuffle — meant to
solidify the Bush agenda, not submerge it in incoherence — is just
step number one.
STEP NUMBER TWO IS lining up the diplomatic and military tools we
need to continue a war that won’t be over by 2008. Though the Dem
campaign of 2004 was based on the theory that America can’t take on
more than one problem at a time, we can and we must. The principal
challenge to America in the next four years is the advent of
nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea. All of us, the President
most of all, hope these issues may be susceptible of solution by
means other than war. But we know that the longer we wait to solve
them, the less likely a peaceful solution can be found. Though the
EUnuchs continue to appease Iran with a ever-evolving nuclear
development agreements, the President isn’t content to wait. In the
APEC conference in Chile, the President raised the pressure on
Iran, saying that Iran’s continued denials of any intent to develop
nuclear weapons were belied by the fact that Iran is speeding the
production of uranium hexafluoride, one of the steps in preparing
fissionable material for nuclear weapons.
Departing Secretary of State Colin Powell said last week that
the Iranians were pushing forward with the development of missiles
to deliver nuclear weapons, and then was blasted for relying on a
single intelligence source for his statement. That the statement
was single-sourced detracts not one bit from its accuracy. Iran
wants to be able to destroy Israel and threaten Europe. Terrorists
can deliver nuclear weapons by many means, and we can rely on Iran
to arm terrorists with them. But if Iran wants to hold itself out
as a nuclear power, it has to have either missiles or aircraft to
deliver the weapons. We don’t need triple-sourced intelligence to
tell us what’s obvious.
One of the administration’s most effective critics of the
Iranian nuke program, Undersecretary of State John Bolton, may be
picked by Condi Rice as her new deputy. Sen. John McCain said on
Meet the Press yesterday that the Iranians may be able to
have nuclear weapons in a matter of months. The U.N. and Old Europe
can choose to paper over the Iranian nuke problem, but we
won’t.
Liberals here and abroad are drinking their own bath water
again, comforting themselves that the mess in Iraq means that we
can’t take action elsewhere to remove and destabilize terrorist
regimes. They are wrong, because they don’t understand that to deal
with these problems a massive invasion is not the only choice. In a
speech to the Special Operations Warrior Foundation on November 11,
Vice Adm. Eric Olson (former boss SEAL and now deputy commander of
SOCOM) said that we have about 6,800 special operations troops
engaged in everything from training to major terrorist hunts in
some 52 countries. Whatever we do in Iran won’t be what the EUnuchs
and the mullahs expect. I suspect that Adm. Olson (whose middle
name, fortuitously, is Thor) will be tossing a few lightning bolts
into the mix. And he does have all of Porter Goss’s phone
numbers.
While the U.N. fiddles, and Iran and North Korea burn the
midnight oil pursuing nukes, about 60 nations are now part of our
Proliferation Security Initiative, the quasi-military alliance that
is now interdicting missile and WMD shipments between and among
rogue states and terrorists. Kim Jong-il is arguing that North
Korea can sell whatever it likes to whomever it chooses. It will
cost us much to convince Kim — and his successors — otherwise. It
is W’s job to minimize that cost, and that he will do while
attending to Iraq.
The Iraqi election is scheduled for Sunday, January 30, 2005.
According to a senior Defense Department source, 14 of 18 Iraqi
provinces are stable and almost secure. About 20 political parties
have already registered to participate in the elections. The urgent
message being sent to Syria — from whence much of the funding for
the insurgency comes, courtesy of Oil-for-Food money scammed by
Saddam — is that they need to lay off now, or suffer the
consequences very soon. Bashar Assad’s regime is likely the next to
fall. It matters not whether we or the Israelis do it. Syria’s role
in the Iraq insurgency, and Iran’s, are not going to suffer from
inattention much longer. Mr. Bush wants to leave America a safer
place, and to do that he’s working as hard at home as he is
abroad.
BECAUSE THE WAR WON’T be over in January 2008, the President
realizes that he has to ensure that the Dems — unless they come to
their senses and throw the Michael Moorons out of their party —
won’t regain the presidency until the war is over. To do that, the
President has to do something no president has done before: ensure
the ascendancy of his successor.
Mr. Bush won this election because, as he often said, people
knew where he stood. But that’s not all of it. Americans trust the
President with their lives and their values. Most importantly, Mr.
Bush’s campaign was directed to every voter in every precinct in
the nation. The most radical idea in some minds in the White House
is that if someone can rise above the crowd after 2006, and if
Americans can learn to trust that person as they now trust George
W. Bush, that person can be the 44th president of the United
States. Should Vice President Cheney retire in 2006 to make way for
the next president? Maybe. Can some cabinet member be groomed for
the job even if Cheney stays? Or, more likely, should someone we
don’t even think of now be pushed into the limelight as more than a
faithful member of Mr. Bush’s team?
If Mr. Bush is as smart as we think he is, he will groom more
than one contender. After the 2006 election, we’ll be seeing a lot
more of a couple of these guys. The EUnuchs and the Mooron Dems
don’t think the President can walk and chew gum at the same time.
But right now he’s proving that he can sprint and shape the future
with one hand tied behind his back.
TAS Contributing Editor Jed Babbin is the author
of Inside the Asylum: Why the UN and Old Europe Are Worse Than
You Think (Regnery Publishing).
