# The American Spectator

home
Print Email
Text Size

## Polling for Yourself

How can John Kerry win if most people tell you it wonâ€™t be easy?

About a month ago, I began mailing around what I called a “personal psychographic” question to various friends and Internet acquaintances. The question aimed to tap a person’s inner knowledge in order to effect a prediction about the election. Rules were simple: You assigned a percentage to each of four categories. All four categories had to add up to 100%.

The four categories were:

p>Kerry landslide br> Kerry close win br> Bush landslide br> Bush close win /p>

Play around with these categories a while, and you’ll discover what’s so revealing about them. Even a Kerry partisan would — I’d guess — assign no more than a 5% chance of a Kerry landslide. A more realistic guess would be zero. Let’s say 2%, just to be generous.

A close win for Kerry? Give the Kerry partisan his innings again, let him (or her) consider that he’s already assigned a 5% probability to a Kerry landslide, and it’d be hard to figure odds much higher than 50% of that happening.

Okay, so your Kerry partisan is comfy now with a 55% overall prediction of a win.

But wait. That partisan still has to predict (just for him or herself, not for anybody else) what the likelihood of the Bush margins are. And I think even a Kerry partisan might grudgingly admit a 7-10% chance of a Bush landslide. Let’s say 7. And, still grudging, let’s concede that Bush might have a 45% chance of a close victory.

But wait. Remember the rule: All percentages have to add up to 100. If Bush’s total grudging percentages are 52, what are we to do with Kerry’s purported 55? From whom do we subtract what?

Fool with it yourself, regardless of your sentiments. Try to be as realistic as you can. You will find it very, very hard to predict a Kerry win.

Our own esteemed editor, Wlady Pleszczynski, summarized a similar poll last week in his “Editor’s Desk” entry this way:

…America Online polled its users. Normally AOL’s questions lean N.Y. Times left. But this time there was no beating around the bush. The replies from 322,440 plus respondents (at last count) couldn’t have been blunter: 41% predicted Bush wins easily; 29% said “Bush wins tight race.” By contrast, only 26% said “Kerry wins tight race,” and a pitiful 4% noted “Kerry wins easily.” Any way you look at it, that spells Bush over Kerry, by 70 to 30.
Page: 1 2

topics:

Lawrence Henry writes every week from North Andover, Massachusetts.

### More Articles From Political Hay

http://spectator.org/archives/2004/09/17/polling-for-yourself

## FLASHBACK TO: 1995

• ### Pope Culture

A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.

• ### Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck

Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.

• ### In the Absence of Guns

In Britain, defending your property can get you life.

• ### Counting the Costs of Clintonism

The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.

• ### Chuck McHagel

It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.

• ### It’s the Best Time of the Year

The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?

• ### The Bush Crack-Up

Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?