CBS’s hopeless search for truth and documents that have no original. Plus other new insights into Blatherforgerygate. Also: Kerry lowers morale further.
While CBS news anchor Dan Rather can say there
is no internal investigation under way over the alleged forged
documents used as the foundation for an investigation into
President George W. Bush's National Guard service, you wouldn't
have been able to tell from the 15 or so 60 Minutes and
CBS News" staffers working away feverishly on Friday and Saturday
to try to nail down their story.
On Friday, according to CBS News sources, Rather spent the day
on the phone and dealing with CBS suits who were nervous about the
fall out from the story. "All Dan could say was that this was an
attack from the right-wing nuts, and that we should have expected
this, given the stakes," says a CBS News producer. "He was terribly
defensive and nervous. You could tell."
All day Friday, Rather, his producer on the story, Mary
Mapes, and other 60 Minutes staffers were
scrambling to shore up support from their sources on the story.
That effort didn't go so well. By Saturday, one of their key
sources, retired Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, had said
that CBS misled him, and that he had never been shown the memos in
question.
"We pulled the trick of only calling some sources at the last
minute to reconfirm," says the CBS producer. "Someone called
Hodges, I think, on Monday night and read him parts of the
document. The late contacts are a standard practice so we don't tip
off the competition or our sources."
Hodges is a critical loss for CBS News' credibility. He was the
superior officer of the man CBS claims wrote the memo, Lt. Col.
Jerry Killian, who died in 1984.
MEANWHILE, OVER THE WEEKEND journalists from around the country
were attempting to track down the original source of the documents.
"We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says
the CBS News producer. "There are at least two people in this
building who have insisted we got copies of these memos from the
Kerry campaign by way of an additional source. We do not have the
originals, and our sources have indicated to us that we will not be
getting the originals. How that is possible I don't know."
One individual several news outlets were looking at was
Bill Burkett, a former Texas National Guard
officer. Burkett in the past has cooperated with both press and
Democratic Party opposition researchers in slinging mud at
President Bush. Burkett gained some national attention earlier in
the campaign when he claimed he was at National Guard headquarters
in Austin 1997, when he overheard Guard officials and a
representative of then Governor Bush discuss how to sanitize Bush's
files. That story was fully discredited. Nonetheless, Burkett sat
down for at least three different interviews with CBS News for the
story now at the center of the controversy. One of those interviews
was with Rather's producer, Ms. Mapes.
"There are rumors here that if there are any real documents,
they are hand-written notes from Killian that someone like Burkett
was holding, and that instead of using the hand-written notes,
someone typed them up to look more official," says the CBS News
producer. "They would look better on TV and posted on line if they
were typed, but on a number of levels, that story just doesn't hold
up. There are too many inconsistencies factually with what is in
the memos."
THE MOST GLARING ISSUES now are the seemingly phony P.O. Box
addresses used in the headers of at least one of the memorandums.
Such post office box addresses were not used by the National Guard
at that time.
Yet another issue: the 18-month gap between the retirement of
Col. Walter "Buck" Staudt on March 1, 1972, and
August 18, 1973, when the Killian of the disputed memos claimed
that Staudt was putting pressure on him to sugarcoat an evaluation
of Bush. Almost everyone involved in the National Guard in Texas
says Staudt would have had virtually no influence in the active
units nearly a year and a half after leaving the service.
PERHAPS MOST TROUBLING to the CBS News staff looking into how its
story went off the rails is the timing of the memos' appearance.
"Some 60 Minutes staffers have been working on this story
for more than three years off and on," says the CBS News producer.
"There have been rumors about these memos and what was in them for
at least that long. No one had been able to find anything. Not a
single piece of paper. But we know that a lot of people here
interviewed a lot of people in Texas and elsewhere and asked very
explicit questions about the existence of these memos. Then all of
a sudden they show up? In one nice, neat package?"
This CBS New producer went on to explain that the questions
60 Minutes folk were asking were specific enough that
people would have been able to fabricate the memorandums to meet
the exact specifications the investigative journalists were looking
for. "People were asking questions of sources like, 'Have you ever
seen or heard of a memo that suspended Bush for failing to appear
for a physical?' and 'Have you heard about or know of someone who
has any documentation from back in the 1970s that shows there was
pressure to get Bush into the National Guard?' It was like they
were placing an order for a ready-made product. That is the biggest
problem I have with this. It's all too neat and perfect for what we
needed. Without these exact pieces of paper, we don't have a story.
Dan has as much as admitted that. Everyone knows it. We were at a
standstill on this story until these memos showed up."
REPORTERS ARE ALSO LOOKING at staff and associates of Sen.
Tom Harkin, who enthusiastically held a press
conference on Thursday morning using the forged documents as the
tent pole for attacks against President Bush. Harkin called Bush a
"liar."
"Harkin has been pushing this story for a while," says the CBS
producer. "Not this specific story, but the 'Bush is a liar about
his record' story. His people seemed particularly interested in
making sure they could keep their boss up to date on what was going
on."
That Harkin was the individual selected to be the attack dog on
this particular issue was an interesting one, give that Harkin
himself has a checkered history about telling the truth about his
involvement in the Vietnam War.
www.sneakers-uk.com| 4.22.10 @ 3:37AM
It is great!
mili8951| 5.6.10 @ 3:50AM
never out of fashion
http://www.edhardycawholesale.com/
wholesale beads| 3.30.11 @ 4:49AM
good read