(Page 6 of 15)
In one recently reported event, 14 Middle Eastern males fitting the profile of the 9-11 attackers, boarded with no trouble, pretended not to know each other, then milled around, and did everything but hijack of bomb the airplane, in what had to be a dress rehearsal.,
There were marshals aboard (who didn't break their cover) and the plane was met by the FBI after the pilot reported what was taking place.
In another case a Middle Eastern man was discovered trying to peel away the wall between the lavatory and the Cockpit.
p>There was more such behavior on a Puerto Rico flight, but no reports of any arrests or detention. One can only hope this is a ploy enabling the FBI to keep tabs and follow them back to the nest. br> -- G.B. Hall br> Marietta, Georgia /p> p> Back in the 1970s hijacking seemed rather commonplace but no one ever required an impenetrable cockpit door design. Why? The most basic of all security measures, a door with a lock, was never added. Why? This one simple measure, a door with a lock, would have prevented 9/11. Exactly how much imagination does it take to put a door with a lock on a cockpit to prevent a known threat? Obviously, way more than the 5 million plus employees of the federal government. br> -- RW /p> p> SELECTIVE REDUCTION br> Re: Doug Bandow's
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.