The American Spectator

Another Perspective

Rooked

By Colby Cosh on 7.19.04 @ 12:05AM

(Page 2 of 2)

THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT WOULD probably not help its reputation abroad by treating Fischer more harshly than Russia treated Spassky. His name is known wherever chess is played, and he would be regarded widely as a political prisoner. And, indeed, there would be at least an ounce of truth in the description.

I don't have much sympathy for Fischer, though it is worth remembering that there is no record of him having harmed anyone but himself. It is unfortunate that he remains the face of American chess thirty years after he refused to defend the world championship. His reappearance in the headlines will only make matters worse, and ensure that he remains the favorite topic of conversation amongst chessplayers.

Like some haggard ghost, he haunts even the World Chess Federation lists: In theory he still holds a 2780 Elo rating, branded with an "i" for "inactive." If his active status were revived he'd be, technically, rated ten points higher than the present world champion, Vladimir Kramnik.

We presume, when we regard a mentally "sick" man, that there must be really a decent person underneath all the maladjustment, delusions, and torment. Some chess fans seem to expect that coercive psychological treatment will reveal a "real" Fischer no one has ever seen -- a Fischer who plays great chess for art's sake, without quarreling or cosseting. The best one can really hope for is that the ugly legal process will be gotten over with as quickly as possible, and he will be allowed to resume his sordid life of angry solitude somewhere -- out of sight, but for lovers of chess, never quite out of mind.

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Law, Russia