7.6.04 @ 12:01AM
GOOD INTENTIONS, BAD RESULTS
Re: Shawn Macomber's Iraq
Agonistes:
Once more Shawn Macomber gets to the root of the issue, this time the Iraq problem. I agree with his article in that we have been really screwing up in our Iraq policy. We did not come to liberate a nation, we came to defeat a tyrant who was a threat. For better or worse, the Iraqi people (like the Japanese and Germans) share the same guilt as their leaders in that respect, therefore like the Axis powers in WWII, they too, should suffer the same type of occupation. Like then, when the evil was Nazism and a God-Emperor (who was nothing but a figurehead to the Japanese fascists), Islam is the evil and should be expunged from the national government. Shawn was right there.
Nowadays, however, we have a situation which is different from
1945. Instead of a press who backs the war, we have a press as
hostile to this nation as any armed enemy. Instead of jailing
dissidents for subversion (which they are doing with their
dissent), as then, we are allowing these factions to influence our
policy towards that country and that religion. It's amazing that
even with the footage of the torture, murder, etc. of the Iraqi
people, the fools in this country still resist the fact that we
vanquished an evil dictator, who needed to go. No, until the
"people" assert themselves on the right side of the issue, we will
have a screwy policy that will become more of an attempt to counter
the fools in this country rather than help the nation of Iraq
regain its place among the nations of the world as a free and
independent people.
-- Pete Chagnon
Macomber has one thing right: the majority of Iraqis want nothing
to do with the libertarianism he espouses. We want to leave behind
in Iraq democracy and the rule of law. We have not gone through
this war to implant a culture-busting hyper-individualism abhorrent
not only to genuine Islam but any kind of conservatism. At least
Macomber realizes that his libertarianism can win only through the
use of force.
-- Gary Martin
Platte City, Missouri
I was varied greatly distressed in reading your article regarding the current situation in Iraq. It seems Mr. Macomber you have fallen into the same mental moronic trap that many liberals had been in for a long time. It's the old story of "If you tell a lie long enough people will believe it."
The liberals of in this country have for many years been trying to expunge from the consciousness of Americans the concepts of religion and God. We need to remember the history of America, its foundations and the people who founded this great nation. They were a religious people, a people who believed in God, and were willing to die for the freedom to express that belief in politics as well as in private. Indeed it was that belief that provided the core values out of which sprang the Constitution of the United States.
The 16 congressional proclamations for prayer and fasting throughout the Revolution [i. e., the acknowledgment of Jesus Christ, the quoting of Romans 14:17, etc.] were not unusual considering the prominent role that many ministers played in the Revolution.
One such example is John Peter Muhlenburg. In a sermon delivered to his Virginia congregation January 21, 1776, he preached from Ecclesiastes 3 which speaks of a season and a time to every purpose under heaven. Arriving at verse 8, there is "a time of war and time of peace," Muhlenburg noted that this surely was not a time of peace; this was the time of war. Concluding with a prayer, and while standing in full view of the congregation, he removed his clerical robes to reveal beneath them the uniform of an officer in the Continental Army! He marched to the back of the church and ordered the drumbeat for recruits. More than 300 men joined him, becoming the Eighth Virginian Brigade. Muhlenburg finished the Revolution as a major general.
The spiritual emphasis manifested so often by the Americans during the Revolution caused one Crown-appointed British governor to complain: "If you ask an American who is his master, he'll tell you he has none. And he has no governor but Jesus Christ."
Letters like this, and sermons like those preached by the Rev. Peter Powers, gave rise to the motto of the American Revolution. Most are unaware that the American Revolution even had a motto, but most wars do [e.g., World War II -- "Remember Pearl Harbor;" the Texas war for independence -- "Remember the Alamo;" etc.]. The motto of the American Revolution was directed against King George III who regularly violated, "the laws of nature and of nature's God."
The motto was very simple and very direct: "no King but King Jesus!"
To conclude that being a dedicated and committed Christian is
the same thing as being a radical Islamist is ignorance gone to
seed. That is the same type of convoluted logic that would conclude
that a cow and a cat are near relatives because they both have four
legs and like milk when they are young. Please Mr. Macomber, stop
hiding from the obvious truth of the Christian religious element
that was so very prominent in the founding of this great nation of
"The United States of America."
-- Pastor Gary J. Eberts
READY FOR TORTURE?
Re: George Neumayr's An Equal
Opportunity to Die:
"Exposing female GIs to the Zarqawis of the world is an experiment in equality the left won't abandon no matter what that savage does in the coming days."
As a retired Air Force Senior NCO, that happens to be female, I do not think that American Society is ready. I believe that WHEN an American servicewoman is held hostage, it will once again energize the media (worldwide) and up the debate on the United States and President Bush's policies. Those of us that bear the burden (or have borne that burden in the past) ARE well aware, but not "ready" for its impact.
I do not share the "praises" that the liberal feminists were singing. Each and every death is a tragic loss, to the families, and to the unit to which they were assigned. It has not been published but I am sure that there are still Army personnel, enlisted and commissioned, that have regrets of sending a young mother into harm's way and to her death. I have sent young men and women into harm's way and then prayed for their safe return. I now stand "behind" those on the front, as generations of veterans did when I was on the watch.
I pray we kill the bastard [Zarqawi] before he, or any of his
ilk, have the chance!
-- Sandra Dent
Why wasn't this women home with her kids where she belongs. Women
have NO PLACE in the Army, on a battlefield. What kind of
barbarians are we, to send women into harm's way. Without them the
world ends.
-- Tom Cohoon
If the terrorists are smart, not only will they capture American
female troops, but they will delay execution. instead they will
make a series of videos showing the same American female having to
endure repeated torture sessions. The heads of NBC, CBS, and ABC,
as well as the Washington Post and New York
Times, have privately passed word that they will willingly
show all episodes on American television. Already leftist groups
here in the States are preparing arguments in defense of what will
happen to these women. They will be made to look like they were
pawns in service to Israel and a wicked Bush administration. The
line fed to American women will be something like, see how your
sisters suffer from following an illegally elected president, or
something in that general vein. Of course women on the left will
praise the sacrifice of these modern American Amazons. I wonder
just how the overall American public will handle these videos as
they will graphically display acts of rape, mutilation of female
body parts, gouging out of eyes, etc., they will be treated much
worse than the male soldiers precisely because they are women and
by hurting them they may turn our support to a desire to quit the
war. With a possible draft looming on the horizon, will Americans
allow their daughters to be drafted? This action could in a way
give support to a weak anti-war movement. Right now we seem to have
things under control in Iraq. What happens, though, if Iran goes
nuclear? What happens if Syria and Iran become even more involved
in the Iraqi terrorism? While the left in America regards American
women in combat as a glorious thing, I do not think the vast
majority of Americans support this policy. We will soon see how
America handles such a thing.
-- Warren Baco
A THOUSAND CLOWNS
Re: Mark Goldblatt's Coalition of
the Wild-Eyed:
I think President Bush, 43, tried to address the problem of the Left engaging in intellectually dishonest debate over public policy issues when he let Senator Kennedy have a major hand in the education bill. This has become a major failing of the Bush presidency. Apparently, the Left does not play marbles unless they have all of the marbles.
Political discourse with the Left has increasingly become the
art of being the straight man for a bunch of clowns who have
mastered the art of exaggeration. Playing the fool in a political
argument is hard work but, it pays off. Most people do not have the
will or the political background in history and economics to tell
the dueling combatants apart after they drone on beyond the sound
bite attention span of today.
-- Danny L. Newton
Cookeville, Tennessee
HIPPO HEAT
Re: John McGinnis's and Mike Spencer's letters (under "No Sweat")
in Reader Mail's On the
Town:
Re: John McGinnis's post regarding hippos in Dallas-Fort
Worth:
John, you forgot to mention the extremely large folks who drive
mini-vans. They apparently believe that because the hood is so
short, they can tail-gate you at 80 and stop on a dime. For some
reason, there are a large percentage of female drivers here who are
very, very angry, and seem to be trying to work out their problems
on the cell phone with their analyst while driving at speeds
approaching light-speed.
As for D.C., I do the Marine Corps Marathon every year in late
October, and the weather has been exceptional on the day of the
race the last two years. I recommend October highly.
-- Mike Webster
Dallas, Texas
John McGinnis' reply to H. W. Crocker III reminded me of the time I lived in Arlington, TX circa 1984-1986.
Texas, at that time if not today, didn't have a law against the driver, much less the passenger, of a vehicle possessing an open container of alcohol.
I clearly remember once when the Texas legislature wanted to
remedy that and a local news outlet in Fort Worth interviewed
people for their reaction. I've never forgot one young woman's
(probably a Democrat) simple view on the subject: "Well, the
driving around here is so crazy, you have to be able to drink a
beer to cope." The irony was dripping off my TV!
-- Greg Barnard
Franklin, Tennessee
About Mike Spencer's letter: Hey Mikey, I love Washington also, but I try not to dwell too much on the "obese" among us -- come on, ease up .
Believe me too I agree with you about the obnoxious boors trying to run you guys over with their "Amigos." You can see those guys EVERY day in the supermarket or at Wal-Mart.
Maybe your son wasn't kidding. Take a pill and enjoy.
-- Gene Hauber
Meshoppen, Pennsylvania
SURE LOSERS
Re: The "Homing Instincts" letters in Reader Mail's Extremism Is
a Vice:
Few of the disgruntled Republicans who threaten to stay home on election day ever mention Congress. I wonder if they know that by law the U.S. House of Representatives initiates all spending bills. I wonder if they voted for a more conservative Republican representatives in the primary elections held earlier this year or if they stayed home then, too. Hmmm. I wonder if they've heard that Democrats in the U.S. Senate filibuster at the drop of a hat because they can always count on the votes of several Republican senators. Finally, I wonder if some of these self-identified "Republicans for 40 years" voted for H. Ross Perot once or twice. Did the spoiler role work for the Perotistas? Did that "giant sucking sound" the Perotistas heard from NAFTA go away? Ever? Do disgruntled Republicans think President Kerry letting the terrorists win while raising their taxes will make them happy? Then they are correct. They should switch to Independent and wash their hands of the Republican Party. Then no matter what happens it won't be their responsibility. Will it?
Let freedom reign,
-- John Scherwitz
Clear Lake, Texas
topics:
Taxes, Education, Television, Economics, Religion, Islam, Constitution, Law, Iraq, Iran, Israel, NATO, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Oil
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
By George Will
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.
Home |About |Contributors |Advertise |Donate |Privacy Policy |Contact
The American Spectator Foundation is the 501(c)(3) organization responsible for publishing The American Spectator magazine and training aspiring journalists who espouse traditional American values. Your contributions are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Each donor receives a year-end summary of their giving for tax purposes.
Copyright 2012, The American Spectator. All rights reserved.