By Jacob Laksin on 6.17.04 @ 12:07AM
Teresa Heinz Kerry’s feelings come pouring out of the bottle -- even about Max Cleland.
The line on Teresa Heinz Kerry, heiress of the Heinz ketchup
fortune and wife of the presumptive Democratic nominee for
president, is that she's a woman of principle, a hear-me-roar dame
who tells it like it is. Well, that's her line, anyway. "At my age
I'm entitled to have strong beliefs," the 65-year-old recently told
Vogue. "I'd be a ninny if I didn't."
She's not alone in this estimation. Democrats desperate to
jumpstart her husband's lackluster presidential campaign have also
embraced Heinz Kerry's flinty frankness. Their hope is that she'll
spark that part of the electorate cool to Kerry but piqued over the
president, a strategy Heinz ketchup users will instinctively
recognize as tapping the center.
With that in mind, Democrats have been going out of their way to
both keep Heinz Kerry from the spotlight and parade her for the
cameras, making sure she keeps both her quiet mystique and her
outspoken allure. Senator Ted Kennedy has called her, "A woman of
compassion, a woman of purpose, the secret weapon for John Kerry."
John Kerry, taking a page out of his wife's book, gushes that "She
looks people in the eye; she tells it like it is."
For her part, Heinz Kerry seems to savor the spotlight. So much
so, according to a 2003 article in Boston Magazine, that she's
actually turning off potential Kerry backers. At a joint husband
and wife campaign event, the magazine spotted one attendee who was
visibly vexed by Heinz Kerry's obvious affection for the sound of
her own voice. "The problem," noted the woman, "is that she just
doesn't stop talking." Some Democrats, it seems, don't want any
Heinz with their Kerry.
If that discourages Heinz Kerry, she hides it well. Even as she
grumbles about right-wing character assassins that allegedly have
disturbed her treasured private life, she seems thoroughly to enjoy
her role as a primetime cheerleader for her husband. Flanked by a
crack communications team, she's even begun to go on the
offensive.
The latest in Heinz Kerry's partisan charge is her Tuesday
interview with the "CBS Evening News." A
registered Republican for years, Heinz Kerry went on the program to
explain her defection from the GOP rolls in 2002. On the face of
it, the answer seems simple enough: That was the year John Kerry
announced his presidential bid. Plainly, the missus wanted to be a
team player. Heinz Kerry wants us to think otherwise. Her version?
"The Republicans Made Me Do It!"
Heinz Kerry insists she was so incensed by the angry Republican
attacks on Sen. Max Cleland (D-Ga.), a Vietnam veteran and triple
amputee, during his failed 2002 reelection campaign, that she
pulled a Benedict Arnold act (as her husband might say), departing
for the happy pastures of the Left, where anger is of course
unknown. The Associated Press, which should really be getting
compensation from the Kerry campaign, loyally reports that, indeed,
"The GOP had raised questions about Cleland's patriotism because of
his position on legislation to create the Department of Homeland
Security."
At this supposed injustice, Heinz Kerry is predictably revolted.
"Three limbs and all I could think was, 'What does the Republican
party need, a fourth limb to make a person a hero?' And this coming
from people who have not served. I was really offended by that."
And so on.
Now I don't know how well this
victim-of-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy act goes over with genuine
centrists, but it's sure to be a hit with those never-been
Republicans who today fancy themselves betrayed by a president
they've hated since day one. For what it's worth, though, Heinz
Kerry's pained account of the Cleland campaign bears little
relation to reality.
True, Cleland's Republican opponent, Saxby Chambliss, did accuse
Cleland of hamstringing President Bush by refusing to vote for a
Homeland Security bill unless civil service jobs were retained.
(The president had the crazy idea that he should be able to fire
those who'd failed at their job.) That Cleland did in fact do so is
tidily ignored by Democrats today, just as it was by Cleland in
2002. Rather than defending his voting record, Cleland screamed
bloodied patriotism. "I served this country, and I don't have to
prove my patriotism to anybody," he wailed.
The only evidence Cleland could produce to support this charge
was a single ad, briefly aired by the Chambliss campaign. Featuring
split-screened pictures of Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and U.S.
soldiers, the ad morphed into shots of Max Cleland, questioning his
obstruction of homeland security efforts and calling his record in
that regard "misleading." About patriotism, there was not a word.
Additionally, while Chambliss modified the ad amid a Cleland-led
uproar, redacting pictures of bin Laden and Saddam, the Cleland
campaign stayed personal, accusing Chambliss of gutting Medicare
and running an ad snarling that "The more you learn about Saxby
Chambliss, the sicker you get."
Heinz Kerry's claims about attacks on Cleland's patriotism thus
strain credulity. Of course, one can hardly blame her for doing all
she can to support her husband's campaign. Reportedly a devoted
environmentalist, she may even have reasonable grievances against
the "Right Wing Smear Machine," which, given that it doesn't run on
hot air like the "Left Wing Smear Machine," is not nearly as
green-friendly. But if candor and frankness are the values Heinz
Kerry brings to the Kerry ticket, perhaps it is not too much to ask
that she live up to them. At the very least, if she ought to be
able to take as good as she gives. After all, she'd be a ninny if
she didn't.
topics:
Environment, NATO, Medicare