By Hunter Baker on 6.1.04 @ 12:04AM
Can there still be such a thing as a great Christian university?
WACO, Tx. -- Most who see the name Baylor University in print
think about the basketball program scandal in which one player
murdered another and the coach scrambled to cover up improprieties
as the media spotlight focused in on the school. Those who observe
the intersection of worldview and higher education have been paying
attention to what's happening at Baylor for a different reason. The
university nestled in at the corner of I-35 and the Brazos River
has embarked upon an ambitious quest to advance the Christian
mind.
Back in 1951, William Buckley began his career as a conservative
superstar with the publication of God and Man at Yale. The
thesis was that the great university had abandoned its
traditionally Christian roots and was actively employing the sort
of faculty who would lead impressionable young people astray, that
is to say, away from love of God, country, and family. The young
Catholic with the million dollar vocabulary and the truckload of
savoir faire had put his finger on an issue that became a staple of
the conservative complaint against modernity. Buckley helped raise
awareness that America's great universities, spurred on by the
success of Darwinian theory and the apparent ascendancy of
so-called "scientific" forms of government like communism and
socialism, now embraced an account of knowledge that ignored or
actively discredited the combination of Christianity and Classics
that had once been dominant building blocks of the West.
Since that time, a number of small schools like Hillsdale, Grove
City, Calvin College, Wheaton, and a few others have provided an
alternative to the assumptions of secular liberalism embraced by
most institutions of higher education. Among major universities,
Notre Dame has been alone in simultaneously claiming a position as
a top tier research institution while retaining at least part of
its religious identity in teaching and research.
Eyeing Notre Dame's success and hoping to buck a trend toward
secularization that had long overtaken schools like Duke, Emory,
and Wake Forest, a group of intellectual entrepreneurs at Baylor
University, a Big Twelve school and the largest Baptist university
in the world, set out to accomplish a unique goal. Baylor President
Robert Sloan, former Provost Donald Schmeltekopf, current Provost
David Jeffrey, and several others on a Board of Regents that
includes Houston Astros owner Drayton McClane, decided to drive
Baylor toward a greater acknowledgment of its Christian identity
while also pushing for top tier research university status.
Although the plan called for massive upgrades to Baylor
facilities and the expansion of degree programs, the key change in
policy has been to explicitly seek to hire Christian scholars
capable of integrating their faith with scholarship. Examples of
the type of faculty attracted by the new emphasis on the
integration of faith and learning include well-known philosophers
like Boston College's Thomas Hibbs and recent Princeton University
Visiting Fellow Francis Beckwith, eminent sociologist Rodney Stark
from the University of Washington, and literary scholar Ralph Wood
from Wake Forest. Instead of diminishing the quality of Baylor's
faculty, the search for explicitly Christian thinkers seems to have
attracted scholars who share a passion for the idea of a great
Christian university.
While Baylor can point to its share of successes during the
nearly decade-long presidency of Robert Sloan, the ambitious
expansion into graduate education, new emphasis on faculty
research, and focus on aggressively seeking out faculty who can
integrate their faith with their scholarship has stirred up a great
deal of opposition from the school's older faculty and retired
administrators. Thanks to the broad scope of the change and
occasional indelicacy in making the transition, President Sloan has
suffered two "no confidence" votes from the old-line dominated
faculty senate. After the first vote last fall, the Board of
Regents backed Sloan with an overwhelming affirmation. In the wake
of the second vote in May, the Regents retained Sloan with a simple
one vote margin.
SLOAN IS FIGHTING ON at least three fronts. The first is
intellectual. Many academicians have been trained to believe that
faith and reason are either irreconcilable or irrelevant to each
other. As an example, some older faculty complain that the only
Christian way to teach a subject like political science is to teach
it well. They ignore the reality that faith influences the
questions one asks and the solutions one may consider. The second
is spiritual. Moderate Baptists are incredibly dedicated to
freewill and tend to see the Sloan administration's careful
interview process as overly searching. The third is a simple human
dynamic. Sloan is the type of leader who drives his agenda forward
with hopes of soothing hurt feelings after the tough sledding is
finished. Among moderate Texas Baptists with ruffled feathers
remaining from the loss of the Southern Baptist Convention to their
"fundamentalist" cousins, grudges of every kind have been quick to
harden.
To some extent, what Sloan has set in motion is irreversible. He
has presided over the hiring of approximately half of the 800-plus
faculty at the school. Youth is on the side of change as well. Most
of the opposition professors are older than Sloan's prized
recruits. Whether the change continues in slow motion due to
inertia or with dispatch thanks to the continued presence of
guiding vision is what's at stake now. It is possible that Sloan's
administration has absorbed as much punishment as the opposition
can muster. On the other hand, the slender margin by which he has
been retained may cripple him.
Regardless of what happens next at Baylor, the school has taken
a major stride forward in offering a new vision for education and
research at a major university. The idea that faith and reason
can't coexist or are "non-overlapping magisteria" is beginning to
encounter resistance. The challenge Baylor has taken up was issued
long ago by giants like Carl F.H. Henry and Elton Trueblood. It has
since been re-issued persuasively by Christian historians like
George Marsden and Mark Noll. Initially, expectations were modest.
Perhaps an endowed chair here or a special institute there at a
large school. But with Baylor, the idea of a university
simultaneously reaching for research excellence and Christian
identity at the same time has begun to become a reality. Let's hope
the same Board of Regents that once strongly approved this great
vision will have the courage and fortitude to see it through. May
God grant them favor in so doing.
topics:
Education, Socialism, Communism