The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 3 of 13)

BR>-- Christopher Gaul p> BYTE SIZE BR>Re: David Hogberg's The No Clue Election : p>David Hogberg displays, based on recent history, uncharacteristically wild optimism: "...no one may be able to confidently predict a winner until November 3." p>After all, touch screens may byte harder than butterflies -- they'll certainly spawn more conspiracy theories (indeed, they already have) than plain old chad. If this election is as close as the last (and Bush wins), we can look forward to a DNC, err DNA, pin prick at the polling places in 2008... BR>-- Mark Hessey BR>Belmar, New Jersey p>The quote below came out of a recent article out of Germany: p>""I don't know of any other country where so many people in authority so eagerly talk down their own country,' Mr. Rau said in an unusually hard-hitting speech." p>The reason the winner will be … Bush is that the same thing is happening in this country. And the Democrats are the ones talking down this country. We are no longer gullible, or stupid. Clinton taught us how to think!

topics:
Trade, Business, Law, Military, Iraq, Russia, Israel