(Page 5 of 12)
Adrian Dater br> Denver, Colorado /p> p> I find it interesting that, in the midst of an incredibly biased article you attack other media sources of bias. It is not enough that your whole basis for attacking Mr. Brock's new website is its entertainment value. Apparently that is all that matters to "unbiased" journalists such as yourself, is the entertainment value and not the facts for which you base your opinions. I would ask that before you write your right wing propaganda, and attack other media outlets for being liberal, you first take an honest look at yourself, oh wait a minute, you obviously don't believe in honesty; otherwise you wouldn't support the lies of people like Rush Limbaugh. It is really disappointing that people in America, especially media personalities such as yourself are so blinded by ideology that you no longer can look at anything objectively. br> -- Dave Rechtenbach br> rechtdg@netscape.net /p>I read your piece "Brock's Content." You use the strategy of the Bush election machine, i.e., indict the opposition for attitudes, ideologies and actions that are your own standard operating procedure.
You are simply terrified that your political opponents are (finally) building an effective antidote to your disinformation-all-the-time infrastructure.
p>You dismiss Brock and the "fledgling liberal radio talk shows" he's presumably going to assist. Let me assure you I and the vast majority of the sentient public would never have heard of your profoundly obscure, if self-absorbed, eminence had we not been seeking Brock's new web address. br> -- John Puma br> Lebanon, Oregon /p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.