The American Spectator

Reader Mail

p> IT'S OVER br> Re: Wlady Pleszczynski's Brock's Content : /p>

I love when an article tells me how to feel. That is brilliant. In "Brock's Content" I am reminded over and over again that I am bored and that I must be near coma. I have an idea. Let the READER decide what is boring or not. I happen to be very entertained by MediaMatters.org.

Bottom line here, when you have no story, you have to make one up. You have no angle, you must create one. The angle you have employed here is that mediamatters.org is boring. What a scathing report. Nowhere do you mention where mediamatters.org is wrong or incorrect in their statements. Yes, the lies being told by the right may not be top of the fold news, but they are still lies subverting the truth … in the media, the one tool people have to make their decisions. If our only choices on how to decide how we feel are filled with inaccuracy, how can we expect the population to ever be wise enough to make those decisions? Oh … we can't. So, until you can refute the arguments made, beyond just calling them names, please refrain … or more directly, shut up.

Your game is over. Seriously. And you know it too, otherwise we would not have the need for personal attacks. So enjoy your long slumber back into obscurity. If you listen closely enough, you can hear your impeding doom.

p>Peace, br> -- Justin Vorhees /p> p> I'm always amused by people's attempts to refute the notion that there is a liberal bias to the media. A local letter-to-the-editor writer denied a liberal bias and cited Fox News as evidence. I should have sent the letter to Fox. I'm certain they would have been pleased to know that their efforts outweigh those of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, PBS, etc. br> --

topics:
Taxes, Education, Trade, Business, Religion, Islam, Environment, Constitution, Military, Iraq, NATO