The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Sex and the Silly

Sizing up S.J. Parker. A problem with Dad. Naderonomy. Plastic or plastic? Plus much more.
p> A SENSE OF PROPORTION br> Re: Reid Collins’, Wlady Pleszczynski’s What, No Sex? /p>

Whuzzat! You say that Sarah Jessica Parker had a cable television show for the past six years and that it was called Sex in the City. Who knew?

p>Best Wishes, br> — Sam Keck /p> p> Good grief, someone’s knickers are in knots. Sex and the City was everything my life is not — well, almost — which is why I loved the show. Stop analyzing the fun. I’ve watched every episode and still can’t dream up anything better for confession fodder than “engaging in gossip.” For me, Sunday night TV was easy. Malcolm in the Middle ? Get lost.
Page: 1 2 3   Last ›

topics:
Television, Business, Social Security, Global Warming, Constitution, Law, Russia, NATO, Energy, Oil

Letter to the Editor

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2004/02/25/sex-and-the-silly

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

The Mole in Don Draper

James Bowman | 6.17.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT