By George Neumayr on 2.13.04 @ 12:08AM
During the Clinton impeachment he laid the groundwork for the defense of his own "zone of privacy."
John Kerry has addressed intern issues before -- Bill Clinton's.
"I don't think it's that huge," Kerry said about Clinton's perjury
during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. "In fact, on one issue of
perjury it's a question of whether one additional portion of the
body was touched over another. I mean, is that huge?"
Kerry inserted himself into the Impeachment proceedings as a
kind of mediator between the Clinton White House and Congress,
which a Boston Globe story from 1998 found "odd" since
Kerry at the time was "neither an acknowledged party leader nor is
he regarded as any great ally of the White House, and he has
virtually no channels to the House leadership."
Kerry proposed an arrangement for an "expedited vote on
impeachment" in an attempt to save Clinton from one. He cast his
defense of Clinton as a high-minded defense of the Constitution.
"The bottom line is this is bigger than any of us. This is not
about any person's individual journey. This is about our country's
journey," he said.
Kerry was adept at changing the subject from Clinton's conduct
to Congress's: "You are putting our institutions on trial -- the
House, the Senate, the Congress, and the presidency, and the
reputation of all who serve therein."
Should Kerry face questions about the charges of infidelity
previewed on the Drudge Report, he can draw upon his rhetoric honed
during the Lewinsky scandal. Kerry insisted that Americans didn't
care as much as the House Republicans about Clinton's corruption.
That Clinton gutted out the scandals illustrated to Kerry "the
growing up of America."
In a speech during the Impeachment proceedings, Kerry asserted
that the "country does not believe the fiber of our nation is
unraveling over the President's egregious behavior, because most
people have a sense of proportion about the case that seems totally
lacking in the House managers' presentation." He said, "No parent
or school in America is teaching kids that lying or abusing the
justice system is now OK."
Kerry accused Congress of "moralizing," and that "no amount of
inflated rhetoric, or ideological or moral hyperextension" could
elevate the "President's actions to the kind of threat to the
fabric of the country contemplated by the Founding Fathers." Kerry
said he was "stunned by the overreach, the moral righteousness,
even the zealotry of arguments presented by the House managers." He
said "the President is certainly a sinner. We all are," but Clinton
was more sinned against than sinning, having suffered a "violation
of a zone of privacy that is as precious to Americans as the
Constitution itself."
He asked his colleagues, "Who is not deeply disturbed by a
so-called independent counsel grilling a sitting President of the
United States of America about his personal sex life, based on
information from illegal phone recordings?" Ken Starr was a
"congressionally created Javert," Kerry said. He said he wasn't
blaming Clinton's predicament on "the right-wing conspiracy," and
then proceeded to do so, accusing Ken Starr, Robert Bork, Ted Olson
and others of tripping Clinton up in the Paula Jones case. He said
these "entire proceedings arise out of this deeply conflicted,
highly partisan, ideologically driven, political civil rights case
with incredible tentacles into and out of the office of the
independent counsel."
Kerry will have to find a new explanation for his own
predicament. "Kerry will implode over an intern issue," says Wes
Clark, according to the Drudge Report. This story originated not on
the political right but with Kerry's ex-staffer Chris Lehane,
according to the e-mail from Congressional Quarterly's
Craig Crawford that Drudge posted.
Crawford's e-mail, by the way, may explain Al Gore's perplexing
endorsement of Howard Dean. A former Gore flak, Lehane, says
Crawford's e-mail, has "shopped" around the intern allegation about
Kerry, which "was one reason the Gore vetters in 2000 shied away
from Kerry as a running mate choice -- their conclusion that it
wasn't bad enough to disqualify him, except for the fact that they
couldn't risk it as they were trying so hard to distance themselves
from Clinton's personal failings."
Kerry helped Clinton to survive impeachment. The low precedent
this set may help Kerry survive whatever charges materialize
against him. Kerry once told the press that "Democrats were very
sophisticated in making a distinction between the policies and
personal behavior of President Clinton." This "sophistication" --
not to mention the sophistry Kerry used during the Monica Lewinsky
scandal and impeachment hearings -- will likely be on display in
the days ahead.
topics:
Bill Clinton, Constitution, Founding Fathers