By Ralph R. Reiland on 1.14.04 @ 12:03AM
Who really likes which? James Carville, for one, doesn’t have a clue.
"Democrats lied about something we really like: sex. Republicans
lie about something they really like: war and money."
That's the analysis by former Clinton campaign strategist James
Carville in his book, Had Enough? That means, I suppose,
that the '60s Democrats had it right all along. Make love, not
war.
On the money issue, I doubt if Mr. Carville is donating many of
the proceeds from this latest book to the Little Sisters of the
Poor. And measured in the number of dollars that can be pocketed in
the shortest amount of time, Carville isn't doing at all bad for
someone who puts himself in the opposite camp from those who
"really like" the cash. He's represented exclusively by the
Washington Speakers Bureau, meaning it takes $20,500 to get him to
the podium for an hour, plus first-class expenses and top
accommodations.
Also on the money, "The Office of James Carville," i.e., "The
Official Web Site of James Carville," explains how Carville, "an
author, speaker, restaurateur and talk show host," parlayed his
"winning streak" in politics -- starting in 1986 "when he managed
the gubernatorial victory of Robert Casey in Pennsylvania" and on
through to 1992 "when he guided William Jefferson Clinton to the
presidency" -- into a global cash cow.
"After the Clinton victory, Carville began to focus on foreign
consulting," explains the Web site. "Since that time, Carville's
political clients have included the following: Greek Prime Minister
Constantine Mitsotakis; Brazilian President Fernando Enrique
Cardoso; Honduran Prime Minister Carlos Flores; President Jamil
Mahuad of Ecuador; the Liberal Party of Canada; British Prime
Minister Tony Blair; Sao Paulo Mayor Celso Pitta; Argentine
Economic Minister Domingo Carvallo; Francis Labastida of Mexico;
Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago Basdeo Panday; and President
Hipolito Mejia of the Dominican Republic. In 1999, Carville led
Ehud Barak to victory in his campaign to become Prime Minister of
Israel."
I might be wrong, but it seems like someone would have to
"really like" money" in order to do all that globe-trotting just to
put together a bang-up media blitz for some politician in
Saõ Paulo or to get the right set of bureaucrats installed
in Honduras.
CARVILLE MIGHT BE WAY off base, too, when it comes to sex -- as far
as Democrats being more frisky. All I know is that pornography
consumption per capita is higher in the blue states won by Al Gore
and that population growth is higher in the red states won by Bush.
I'd say that means Republicans are doing the real thing and that
Democrats need to get over their pie-in-the-sky utopias, same as in
economics.
None of the above, of course, will much matter in the next
election. No one will care about Monica's handbags or Carville
carrying on about Republican money grubbers while he's piling up
his own stash. The big issue will be war, a thing, Carville says,
that Republicans "really like."
On the one side, George W. Bush will be saying what he's been
saying since Sept. 11: "Our greatest fear is that terrorists will
find a short cut to their mad ambitions when an outlaw regime
supplies them with the technologies to kill on a massive
scale."
On the other side, Democratic Presidential contender Dennis
Kucinich, taking a stand a bit to the left of Howard Dean, recently
told a Cleveland audience that he was "running for president of the
United States to enable the Goddess of Peace to encircle within her
arms all the children of this country and all the children of the
world."
Well, call me an agnostic but the Goddess of Peace certainly
appeared to be asleep at the switch when Saddam Hussein dumped
thousands of Iraqi kids and their parents into hundreds of mass
graves over the past three decades. What put a stop to that was
American B-52 bombers and M-1 Abrams tanks, not pipe dreams and
mythology.
The issue now and into the next several decades is not whether
Republicans "really like" war but what we're going to do about the
terror ahead. What do we do about Pakistan's "Islamic bomb," the
phrase used by former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto? What do
we do about the nuclear weapons programs in North Korea and
Iran?
"Two crazy states," i.e., North Korea and Iran, writes Gabriel
Schoenfeld in the November 2003 issue of Commentary, "both
perpetrators of acts of international terrorism, both animated by a
blistering hatred for America and the West, are bent on acquiring
weapons of unthinkable destructive power."
It's my bet that the Goddess of Peace won't be able to knock out
the threat without some pre-emptive action by the Pentagon.
topics:
Economics, Islam, Law, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Pakistan, NATO, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons