By Enemy Central on 12.19.03 @ 8:27PM
Doing right by Saddam, Howie and Hillary.
What's in a pretty face? No one could decide. The underground
rock star formerly known as Saddam emerged under the glare of klieg
lights to send fans scurrying for appropriate comparisons. He looks
likes the Unabomber, some shrieked. Like Al Gore, others chanted.
Like Charles Manson someone added. Like Karl Marx, Solzhenitsyn, Ho
Chi Minh. Left-wing critics of the form his arrest took are
charging that results of his lice tests have been suppressed. They
want to compare his plight to that of the homeless and thus blame
his condition on the policies of President George W. Bush.
More outrageous was manner in which the Bush team proceeded to
cover its tracks, bowing to pressure from donors at Schick and
Gillette to give the countercultural Saddam a close shave, thereby
turning him into someone almost resembling a post-hippie human.
Pretty soon people were mistaking him for the late Walter Matthau.
Once that happened, everyone from Barbara Walters to Richard Cohen
was demanding that Saddam's life be spared, which was music to his
manager Dan Rather's ears and all of civilized Europe's.
Okay, we're being a little hard on patriot Dan. Needless to say,
even if he did so to protect a source, Dan spent more ours
anchoring coverage of Saddam's capture than any of his competitors.
Tom Brokaw came in at number 2, though his mind, such as it is,
didn't seem to be into the coverage. Word has it he's thinking of
plunging into the Democratic presidential race, where he stands a
good chance of winning more votes than Dennis Kucinich and Carol
Moseley Braun combined, and don't forget to throw in John Edwards.
Ever since his "Greatest Generation" success Tom's carried the
burden of being our generation's General Eisenhower. Can't he just
settle for becoming president of Columbia University?
Nowhere to be seen last Sunday morning and later was His
Excellency Peter Jennings. He never anchors before Sunday brunch,
we were told. But we happen to know he was in Aspen, skiing the
slopes alongside cannonballing Howie Dean, who expects to win in an
avalanche.
Responsible Democrats were skeptical from the first of Bush
military's search and rescue mission. Rep. Jim McDermott, spokesman
for the Dean family, extended condolences to the Saddam clan for a
suspiciously timed violation of their patriarch's privacy. Jim's
confessor at the Vatican, Cardinal Renato Martino, expressed
indignation over the allegedly inhumane treatment of the holy
hermit Hussein. The greatest secretary of state since Warren
Christopher, Mme. Madeleine Albright, took it from there, wondering
aloud how long it would take for the administration to admit it has
Osama bin Laden in custody. Until election eve, 2004? Later, lest
she be mistaken for Sen. Patty Murray, Albright insisted she'd been
joking. If so, she does a better deadpan than Buster Keaton.
Though not as a good as the you-know-it-all, Commandress Hillary
Clinton. Fresh from her long march through Afghanistan, Pakistan,
and Iraq, the New York strongwoman addressed experts at the Council
of Foreign Relations on the need to increase troop numbers in Iraq
and extend their length of service there long past July. No wonder
the next night she invoked Lyndon Johnson as one of the greats
whose policies the current president is turning back. Escalation is
the name of her new game. Instead of vacationing on Martha's
Vineyard next summer she'll hang along the Gulf of Tonkin. Won't
that be some incident!
Other followers of the great political game were struck by Gen.
Hillary's reference to Jimmy Carter as another of her party's
presidential giants whose great achievements the current president
is determined to undo. Actually, it's too late for her to kvetch.
The deed's been done. In his jogging, for instance, the current
president never collapsed. With a hostage crisis brewing he got an
American crew out of China. When he sent helicopters into a desert
they didn't crash and burn. His secretary of state has yet to
resign. He can't even begin to pronounce stagflation. And as every
best-selling Bush hater can tell you, he's never promised, "I will
never lie to you."
By Democrat standards, nonetheless, Ms. Hillary is perfectly
positioned. Given her party's current crew of presidential
candidates, it stands a better chance of winning in 2004 if it runs
no one than if it nominates any of the jokers from Howie Dean on
down. That is, unless she decides to send a man to do the job and
names herself the Democratic nominee.
Her standing in our quarters is just as delicate. Next time we
meet it will be to unveil the Enemy of the Year. It can hardly fair
to the mother of Chelsea and wife of Bill that we've decided to
name her the penultimate EOW of 2003. Now it's for her to figure
out whether this is the closest she'll ever come to winning the big
prize.
topics:
Military, Iraq, Pakistan, NATO