NO KIDDING
Re: Enemy Central's The Mighty
Wind:
Please do not use the word "paleoconservative" to describe the
mainstream conservatism birthed from the forehead of Frank Meyer
and others, when describing ourselves. This word is a rhetorical
device invented by big government/national greatness
neoconservatives and is designed to marginalize those whose fealty
is to the limited government/no foreign entanglements vision of the
Founders. Thank you.
-- Jameson Campaigne
Ottawa, Illinois
DINNER TALK
Re: David Hogberg's Hillary's
Clean Plate:
A lot has been written in the last few weeks about the Iowa
Jefferson-Jackson dinner, but one thing that unfortunately eludes
even the most intelligent conservative thinkers is the hypocrisy
inherent in the Democrats' veneration of Jackson. Doesn't it seem
strange that the party that tries to claim the moral high ground on
matters of race relations honors the president who ordered the
Trail of Tears, arguably one of the worst cases of genocide ever to
occur on this continent? Or maybe that's why FDR decided to add
Jefferson's name to the event -- despite the fact that Jefferson
espoused an ideology of small, limited federal government in favor
of state's rights. In light of all this, why do the Democrats seem
puzzled when they are accused of having no coherent ideology and no
clear heritage or unity?
-- Nick J
Chicago, Illinois
THE WAY THE WORLD WORKS
Re: Brandon Crocker's Lev el
With Us, Please:
Well done, Mr. Crocker. The factual unemployment rate is much lower than that reported by FEDGUV. When employers eliminate positions -- not lay employees off (which implies they are subject to recall as is occasionally the case with labor union employees but not the rest of the work force) -- many enterprising workers start their own businesses as "off the books" sole proprietorships and do not report their earnings to the government. These individuals have not become "too discouraged" to seek employment by others. They are sufficiently resourceful to employ themselves and haven't the slightest desire to pay their "fair share" of punitive taxes.
Having owned an employment agency and an executive search firm
for some 15 years I know whereof I speak.
-- Allen Ross Warmington
Olmsted Township, Ohio
WHEN PUSH COMES TO SUV
Re: Jim Henley's Muscle
Cars:
Jim, your analogy is cute but your logic is flawed. Most of the
exigencies you cite can be dealt with perfectly well with a
selection of all -wheel-drive passenger cars, such as Audi Quattros
or Subarus. They would do as well as or better than SUVs in
ferrying emergency workers during a D.C. snowstorm. They handle
better, ride better, stop much better, and are much more
efficient. They are also much less stressful and tiring to drive
and spend time in, as the ergonomics incorporate the latest design
features. Throughout Europe, people tow trailers with VW Golfs, and
the like. For that minuscule number of people who haul trailers all
the time, an SUV is fine, But most usage of these vehicles comes
nowhere near the circumstances you speak of. Let's face it, an SUV
is a lifestyle statement and nothing more, usually a statement by
posers.
-- Jeremy Nahum
Sorry, I don't buy it. Mr. Henley's justification of suburbia's SUV
obsession is a weak case. The main complaint by SUV critics is that
there is too much power in the vehicles, and not enough fuel
efficiency. Mr. Henley proceeds to ignore this argument and discuss
all-wheel drive and towing capacity. Even these arguments are weak.
SUVs aren't the only vehicles with all-wheel drive, many vehicles
are all wheel drive and have engines with 20+ MPG efficiencies
(e.g. Subarus, Audis, Volvos). SUV's are also not the only class of
vehicles that can tow large loads (e.g. diesel powered VWs). Plus,
towing is a torque-related spec, not horsepower-related spec. Most
critics of SUVs ask for emission standards and fuel efficiency
requirements to be raised. You can have all the desired features
consumers want in an SUV (high torque, all-wheel drive, storage
space) and make it a lot more palatable to the greenies/safety
conscious (lower bumpers, low emissions, high fuel efficiency).
They wouldn't even know the difference.
-- Shane Mullen
Staff Engineer
CAPTURE THE FLOG
Re: Heather Roscoe's Killer
Deal:
I am against the death penalty but for rigorous punishment.
What's wrong with life imprisonment and daily or weekly floggings?
Allow the families of the deceased to wield the whip. Cruel?
Unusual? Not in light of the crimes.
-- Fred Z.
Calgary
What infuriates me is the "costs more to execute" argument. The
left loves that one, except they miss an obvious point: if the
ridiculous appeals process were changed it wouldn't cost more. And
if these really guilty, really heinous criminals were put to death,
perhaps the death penalty would be a deterrent to violent crimes. I
have a feeling, like most of the repeat offenders of all crimes
realize, that the system is a joke, and true punishment almost
never fits the crime. Why isn't it a deterrent? Because these
really bad guys always get to appeal their way out of the ultimate
punishment they deserve.
-- William H. Stewart
Boston, Massachusetts
In some ways I have come to regard life in prison without parole as
worse than Death Penalty Lite (lethal injection). The only
hope is that recipients of this sentence get a small cell. No TV,
no books, no magazines, no correspondence, no visitors, no variety
in their food, no work or activities and no possessions, nothing
but day after day spent in crushing boredom and meaninglessness.
Some of the compassionate existentialists might call this a death
penalty, of sorts.
-- Robert Gaber
My heart goes out to the families of the victims of Gary Ridgway in Seattle. The justice system has failed the families, the victims and the community in which he terrorized for years. Is it not ironic that we rely on the prison population- the very criminal element that we put behind bars for heinous acts, to set things right with these poor unfortunate victims? Gary Ridgway, like Jeffrey Dahmer will not last long in prison. It leaves a foul taste in my mouth that the dregs of society has to do what should be done by the judicial system in America today.