The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Ben Stein's Civil Warriors

A special exchange, as Ben replies individually to every writer.

(Page 6 of 8)

money , and it started in the Senate several years before the first shot was fired. After "the war of northern aggression" was over, there was a concerted effort to change the nations history by destroying historical documents, and it has continued on by convincing people that the war was fought because of slavery, and that our nation began at Plymouth Rock. Could it have been avoided? Of course. But it was much more profitable for the struggling industries of the North, not to. It was also not to the South's advantage to give up the power that it held in the government because of the millions of dollars that came from cotton. At that time, it was perfectly legal for the states to secede, but that would have left the North poor and struggling. And the rest is history? Or whatever, that is, that's taught nowadays. br> -- Candy Bohmert br> North Carolina /p>

With respect, I think there were economic interests at stake, but the overwhelming issue was a moral one: whether slavery should be allowed, and also at stake was a huge amount of Southern ambivalence about slavery. Many in the South were against it, and Lincoln counted on them to help the Union -- and they did.

Still, as another writer wrote, romantic illusions die hard. Love, Ben

*****

As usual, Ben Stein asks thoughtful questions. But the short answer is that Lincoln saw a way to do to the South what Britain had done to the colonies. Since the South was largely agrarian and dependent on labor, forced and otherwise, if the South could be deprived of the majority of its labor, its natural resources would be ripe for the picking. Lincoln and his cronies were right, but it took a lot of bloodshed to make it happen.

p>As to why so many were so brave, two of my ancestors wrote about their experiences, and they remark that when a commander said before an engagement that he expected few of them to live through it, hardly an eyebrow was raised. br> -- Mary McLemore
Page: ‹ First   4 56 7 8  

topics:
Economics, Books, Constitution, Law, Supreme Court, Military, Russia

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2003/11/17/ben-steins-civil-warriors

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Headlines

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley

Terrorism à la Carte

George H. Wittman

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Warren Pulls Even

W. James Antle, III | 5.24.12

Warren Pulls Even with Brown in New Poll

Aaron Goldstein | 5.24.12

Obama at the Academy

Ross Kaminsky | 5.24.12

RET on C-SPAN

TAS Staff | 5.24.12

Romney Ahead in Florida

Larry Thornberry | 5.23.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

A Tsunami of Bad Economics

Ryan Young | 5.23.12

Nobody Pushed Tyler Clementi

Ross Kaminsky | 5.23.12

Ted Kennedy's Anti-Mormon Moment

Daniel Allott | 5.23.12

Greg Sowards Battles Queen RINO

Jeffrey Lord | 5.24.12

We Have To Do Something

Ben Stein | 5.24.12

The Problem With High-Mileage Cars

Eric Peters | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT