By Jeremy Lott on 10.16.03 @ 1:27AM
The Internet tries to stop a disabled woman from starving to death.
The countdown began at two o'clock on Wednesday, October 15th.
That was when Florida Judge George W. Greer's cease-feeding order
went into effect. Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed and most
observers give her 10 to 14 days tops. She will shortly begin to
die of starvation and dehydration.
Schiavo, for the uninitiated, suffered brain damage in 1990. Her
husband Michael convinced a jury to award $1.3 million in 1993,
$750,000 of which was earmarked for her rehabilitation. Instead, he
stuck her in a nursing home, refused to pay for treatment, put her
on the do not resuscitate list, went to court more than once to try
to have her plug pulled, and finally succeeded yesterday.
Maybe it was simply the plight of a poor woman or maybe it was
the utter unlikability of her husband -- he shacked up with another
woman, reportedly spent money earmarked for his wife's rehab on
lawyer fees to try to have her offed, and used the courts to short
circuit any intervention by her parents -- but something about the
case has struck a chord with the technerati.
Catholic blogs are sounding the alarm and helping to organize
protests. Activists are spamming news sites (including this one)
with urgent pleas for help, and requests that people contact
Florida governor Jeb Bush to demand that he do something.
Sites such as Terri'sFight.org are spreading a
version of the story which casts her hubby and the legal system in
the worst possible light. WorldNetDaily.com is churning out
story
after story to try
to make a dent in the public consciousness. Also, a recent
videotape, made surreptitiously by Terri's father in defiance of
court order, which shows this supposed vegetable exhibiting a
remarkable degree of responsiveness, is making the e-rounds.
Whether any of this will have an effect is an interesting
question and may help answer how the Internet changes the social
order. Already, Terri's case has received much more coverage than
it would have, say, five years ago. As we've seen in recent
anti-globalization protests, activists can plan and assemble much
more rapidly and effectively nowadays. Could this mean mass
demonstrations in Florida by the middle of next week? Further, will
any of this change the gruesome outcome? As things stand now, all
Michael Schiavo has to do is run out the clock, and he can inherit
whatever's left of the 1993 settlement.
There is, of course, another aspect of this case that I almost
hesitate to mention. Florida Governor Jeb Bush has promised Terri's
parents all the support he can muster, but he insists that the
courts will have the final word. In a legal sense, he's correct,
but I wonder if his decision isn't a bit like Pontius Pilate
cleverly washing his hands of what is about to happen.
That is, with the intense interest that the case has aroused,
I'm not sure if the courts are ready for the backlash from Terri
Schiavo's death. Many would see the courts as an agent of her
demise, and rightly so. If I were in Congress, I would view Judge
Greer's decision an impeachable offense, as much to avoid the hit
the judiciary would take as anything else. The case is a
potentially delegitimizing one, which places justice and humanity
on one side, and the courts on the other. And the Internet would
make this crime nearly impossible to forget.
topics:
Law