The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Wesley Stop

Gen. Clark and the neocon view. Russert potatoes. Al Qaeda/Iraq. Planned Parenthood's contortions. Plus more.
p> KNOWING BETTER br> Re: John Corry's Two Cheers for Wesley Clark : /p>

While I have no argument with John Corry's conclusion that the good General Wesley Kanne Clark "is not a girly-boy," I find his egregious shot at the "neocons" unworthy of someone who probably knows better. That judgment is not only tiresome, but also smacks of the Bush is a dolt but clever enough to con large numbers of people (including "peace loving" Democrats) into waging war; Bush, the dolt, was too slow to act on intelligence about the threat of a 9/11, but too fast to lance the boil of terrorism in one of its bases of support (Saudi Arabia, Syria et al to come, despite State Dept nonsense); and, Bush, the dolt, revealed, for all to see, the nefarious, double-dealing, no-account UN (that exists by the grace of the American taxpayer) crowd. Of course, Dubya is just a "tool" of the neocons. By the way, there was no UN resolution for the war in Kosovo, the extent of "ethnic cleansing" there pales by comparison with the mass graves being uncovered in Iraq, and Milosevic (like Saddam?) posed no imminent threat to the U.S. And so, I guess that the previous POTUS was a "tool" of who?...our continental European "friends"?

p>Come on, John, had Billy Boy not been "occupied elsewhere" during his tenure, 9/11 most likely would not have happened. The neocons, indeed! br> -- P.A. Melita br> Charlottesville, VA /p>

I am baffled by John Corry's claim that the neocons were "wrong" about Iraq. Virtually everything they said has come true, and continues to come true.

1) The Iraqis, on the whole, did indeed welcome us as liberators. The fact that you could get as many soldiers killed policing Watts as you could in Tikrit doesn't seem to me to equate "failure" of the slightest kind. It means that in any occupation, there are dangers.

2) We just passed a week in which there was not a single American death. That was followed by a couple, then by more days without any. The ratio of deaths-per-day has now grown to deaths-per-every-four or five days. And it will continue to move in this direction until Iraq looks like the DMZ in Korea just after the armistice. By the way, a little research would show that the airborne units policing Austria in 1945 lost 30 men in 31 days, or, about the same numbers was we lost in the first month of the Iraq police action.

Page: 1 2 3   Last ›

topics:
Trade, Business, Abortion, Constitution, Law, Military, Iraq, NATO, Oil

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2003/09/25/wesley-stop

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT