The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 4 of 7)

p> Gee, I find the America-haters' argument on this point to have an interesting extension. Just as our inability to find weapons of mass destruction proves that they did not exist in the first place, so too does our inability to locate Saddam Hussein prove that he never existed, as well. The Congressional Democrats might, therefore, do well to demand answers to the question, "If Saddam never existed, who were all those body doubles actually doubling for?" Mr. Waxman, what do you think? br> -- unsigned /p> p> SCARBOROUGH FARE br> Re: Jeremy Lott's Bill O'Reilly Is Dead ... Wrong : /p>

Hi, I enjoyed your article about Bill O'Reilly. He certainly tends to take himself a little too seriously and has himself admitted to having little knowledge of the Internet. And no doubt his occasional bullheaded charges towards some targets without a full understanding of the subject matter are a little irritating.

p>Unfortunately this is one of the best alternatives to what is on the boob tube these days and is reflected by the immense popularity of the O'Reilly factor. I must say I have occasionally watched a show called "Scarborough Country" on MSNBC which merits a closer look. The few shows I've seen have been accurate and on point. I'll set my Tivo to record this. Hopefully it will turn out to be a success. br> -- Rao Yedla /p> p>

topics:
Iraq, Africa, North Korea, Nuclear Weapons