The White House Correspondents' Association dinner can be a hunter's nightmare -- and a mortician's dream.
Washington -- Last Saturday, after awakening at 5:00 a.m. in
Virginia's Shenandoah Mountains to hunt wild turkey, I showered and
dressed in black tie for one of my favorite Washington evenings,
the White House Correspondents' Association dinner. If I did not
see any turkeys during the matutinal hunt, I was guaranteed to see
them in abundance during the vespertine melee that this
distinguished gathering has become. In all of New York there is
nothing quite like it, though you can find an approximation of it
on the Virginia countryside. I have in mind the county fair, at
least the county fair that is held in an exceptionally rowdy rural
county.
Notwithstanding the dinner jackets and sleek evening gowns, the
White House Correspondents' dinner is always boisterous, sweat
sodden, and very stupid. It is supposed to bring together the elite
of the nation's press for a salute to the President and a lot of
joshing between the White House and the press corps. Yet at some
point about fifteen years ago, the High and Mighty of the White
House Correspondents' Association began to notice that something
was missing from the event. They could not quite figure out what it
was, but they sensed a problem. Those of us who follow the press
with an amused eye knew what the problem was. The Washington press
corps is stupefyingly boring. Almost all of its members
think alike, if they think at all; and what they think is that they
are very important people, so important that it does not matter
that they are frequently wrong -- viz. their recent episodic
pessimism regarding the Three Week War.
Whether the High and Mighty recognized that their problem was
that they were filling the Washington Hilton with morticians I
cannot say, but by now anyone familiar with Washington knows their
solution. It was to invite celebrated goofballs such as Monica
Lewinsky and Ozzy Osbourne, and Movie Stars and TV Stars. I never
fail to attend, though on my excursions I need a guide to point out
the Stars. Do you know who Kelsey Grammer might be, or Richard
Schiff? They looked like Manhattan nightclubbers to me.
My endeavor every year is to reconnoiter the pre-dinner
receptions that are put on by the media giants. In suites that open
on a common courtyard the receptions mix the pols, the press, the
goofballs, and the Stars. After an hour of drinks, the attendees
squirm off to the ballroom through a narrow corridor that soon
becomes reminiscent of a rush hour subway. Once in the ballroom,
seated at tables of ten or so, they continue to gabble until the
President is toasted, whereupon he responds, often with a slide
show. You expected Demosthenes? Meanwhile I continue my
reconnaissance. What I try to discover every year is whether the
Stars really are more thrilling than the dumpy journalists. My
conclusion is that they are not. Perhaps the first two or three
female Stars give off a jolt, but really after a point one must
admit: if you have seen one décolletage you have seen them
all.
The Stars are as boring as the press. What passes for wit from
them are lines such as this from Mr. Bradley Whitford: "I heard
Bush was pretty funny last year, which surprised me because
whenever people ask me if you could do a 'West Wing' with a
Republican administration, my standard answer is no, because
they're not sexy and they're not funny." Where have we heard that
line before?
This year President George W. Bush did not even attempt to be
funny or sexy. He was dignified, stopping just short of being
solemn. He remembered the deaths of two American journalists in the
recent war, Michael Kelly of the Atlantic and David Bloom
of NBC. He reminded the audience that since he appeared last year
"We have seen a dictator defy the world, and we have seen a
coalition of free nations give its answer." The President's speech
was eloquent. Republicans may not be sexually funny, but not since
the Kennedy Administration has a Democratic Administration equaled
their speech writing teams -- or their competence in office. Lyndon
Johnson? Jimmy Carter? Bill Lewinsky?
Usually, the White House Correspondents' dinner features
entertainment from a comedian. This year was different. Owing
perhaps to the gravity of a time of war, the High and Mighty
invited the aged but venerable Ray Charles, who sang a mixture of
country and blues with as much style and panache as ever. He ended
with his own toast to the President:
p>"I like enchiladas and old El Dorados that shine
br>
And old friend the guitar and songs and women and wine
br>
They say that I'm livin too fast but I'm feelin fine
br>
And I just keep easin along in three-four time."
/p>
My hunt of last Saturday was rewarded. I like Ray Charles, and
the Stars and the pols would have too, if only they could have cut
their gabble and listened to him, as the President did.
About the Author
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. is the founder and editor in chief of The American Spectator. He is the author of the forthcoming The Death of Liberalism, published by Thomas Nelson Inc. His previous books include the New York Times bestseller Boy Clinton: the Political Biography; The Impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton; The Liberal Crack-Up; The Conservative Crack-Up; Public Nuisances; The Future that Doesn't Work: Social Democracy's Failure in Britain; Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House; The Clinton Crack-Up; and After the Hangover: The Conservatives' Road to Recovery.