By Paul Beston on 4.30.03 @ 12:03AM
Michael Jordan’s predicament, and how some others have handled it.
Michael Jordan's final comeback came to an end recently when his
Washington Wizards lost, 107-87, to the Philadelphia 76ers. In his
last game, Jordan scored 15 points, the last two on free throws
that were awarded to him by an intentional foul. To say that his
farewell was anticlimactic is no less true for being obvious.
From the beginning, Jordan's comeback was greeted with
predictably split reactions. There were those who were ecstatic to
have the game's greatest player back, and those who felt that he
should stay away. Of the latter, the most sanctimonious voices were
to be found, as usual, among sportswriters, those guardians of all
that is good and pure in American life. The concern was that Jordan
would taint his "legacy" by playing past his prime, and obliterate
the memory of his game-winning, career-capping jump-shot in the
1998 NBA Finals. That play had enabled him, the sportswriters
reminded us, to "go out on top."
It has always been more important to sportswriters that an
athlete go out on top than it is to the athlete. Writers seek
endings; athletes hope for adjournments. Leaving the game on the
writers' terms usually requires that the athlete leave before he is
ready. Most athletes want to play as long as they can, thereby
assuring that they will play past their peak. Jordan was no
different. It turned out that his last retirement was not on his
terms, after all. He had wanted to keep playing, but Chicago Bulls'
management was dead set on breaking up the team, so Jordan decided
to walk.
But he was an athlete whose hunger for the competitive fix knew
few equals; perhaps only Muhammad Ali had a comparable addiction to
the challenge of besting a rival, and perhaps only Ali has held a
similar throne, a king to millions and holder of the mythical title
"most recognized face on the planet." Retirement couldn't compare
to that, so Jordan returned in 2001. It ended 18 months later with
a whimper in Philadelphia. No final glory, no romantic ending, just
an ending.
You might think the sportswriters would appreciate this, in our
age of authenticity and reality TV. Jordan's final farewell was
much more like what we call real life than anything he had given us
before. He wasn't what he had been, but unlike Ali, he could still
perform. He did not embarrass himself. His final game thereby
lacked both the drama of a final heroic gesture and the pathos of
futility that marked Ali's final appearance in 1981. How much more
real can you get?
So there is little reason to mourn Jordan's comeback or its
conclusion. Certainly there is no call for regret that the endless
stream of farewell tributes, which started sometime in 1997, have
at last run their course. What is sobering about the Jordan
comeback is that it demonstrates the enormous difficulty great
athletes have in finding a second life after sports.
Jordan's next steps are uncertain, but they will probably not
stray far from the game of basketball. In whatever he does, he will
seek the competitive fix that has so far eluded him except in an
athletic arena. That's an impossible order to fill, really, since
there is no encore to being king of the world. But before he goes
down the typical road of the ex-athlete, he might find instruction
in the examples of some who were not satisfied with that
designation. For all of the ex-athletes we see broadcasting,
pitching products, or signing overpriced autographs, there are some
who succeeded in creating new lives. And some didn't so much as
linger in their old ones.
Take Alan Page, for example, the Hall of Fame defensive tackle
for the Minnesota Vikings. He completed his law degree while still
playing football, and is now a judge in the state of Minnesota. It
is said that his chambers have family pictures and honors on the
wall, but no pictures of himself from his football days. Roger
Staubach, one of the greatest NFL quarterbacks, runs a group of
successful businesses. Robert Smith was one of the best running
backs in the NFL a few years ago, but left to go to medical school.
Bill Bradley was a starter on great New York Knicks teams who
became a senator. They may not have been of Jordan's stature -- who
is? -- but they knew something about the roar of the crowd and the
difficulty of walking away.
There are plenty of other worthy examples, but two stories stand
out. Pat Tillman left the Arizona Cardinals after the 2001 season
to go on active duty with the Army Rangers, inspired by the
September 11th attacks. He walked away from a three-year, $3.6
million dollar contract to do so, leaving behind the roar of the
crowd for the grim realities of military life -- and a $17,000
salary. His story has received little play, even now when he is
deployed in Iraq. Muhammad Ali was lionized for saying no to his
country; Tillman can barely make the news for saying yes. But then
a man who is willing to leave behind the pampered fantasy world of
pro sports for the sands of the Middle East is not likely to care
whether the media notices.
And then there is Gene Tunney, heavyweight champion from the
1920s, still the most stunning example of an athlete who left and
never looked back. Tunney beat Jack Dempsey twice, retired -- just
once -- and stayed away from the game, preserving his money and his
faculties. He became a successful corporate executive, sitting on
the boards of numerous companies and banks. He befriended Thornton
Wilder and George Bernard Shaw, and pursued a lifelong interest in
literature, the arts, and self-improvement. On his gravestone,
there is no mention of his athletic accomplishments. Instead, he is
remembered for his service in two World Wars. Pat Tillman would
appreciate that, even if generations of sportswriters have never
appreciated Tunney.
The very uniqueness of these examples, of course, points up
their rarity. For most athletes, great and otherwise, it is
difficult to imagine another world. The much-worn phrase in this
context is F. Scott Fitzgerald's: "There are no second acts in
American lives." But what constitutes a second act? Like "going out
on top," it is for the athlete to determine, not the scribes. And
it will now fall to Michael Jordan to determine what his
long-deferred second act will be, and if it's a role he can live
with.
topics:
Business, Sports, Law, Military, Iraq, NATO