The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Mail
Print Email
Text Size

Reader Mail

Serious Candidates

For the Senate, for regime change, for ridicule. Plus much more, including the latest Hillary contest stragglers.
p> NOT A DUNN DEAL br> Re: The Washington Prowler’s A Losing Republican Slade : /p>

Having watched a few Senate campaigns over the years (I was NRSC communications director in the 1982 cycle) I’ve noticed that being the preferred inside-the-Beltway candidate may not translate into victory if the anointed one lacks sufficient fire in the belly.

Senate candidates that come immediately to mind include Elliot Richardson in Massachusetts in 1984 (lost in the primary) and Dick Thornburg in the Pennsylvania special to replace John Heinz. And Democrats aren’t exempt from falling into this trap — ask Fritz Mondale.

p>A nice clear shot at the general helps — but it is worth even more if it is achieved by a candidate building the organization and raising the funds needed to scare off the opposition. br> — Bob Pipkin br> Belmont, MA /p> p> SYRIA SERIOUSLY
Page: 1 2 3   Last ›

topics:
Hillary Clinton, Business, Constitution, Law, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Israel, NATO, Oil

Letter to the Editor View all comments (1) |

Related Articles

More Articles From Reader Mail

http://spectator.org/archives/2003/04/16/serious-candidates

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

Damage Control for Dummies

Matt Purple | 5.22.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment

George Neumayr | 5.22.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT