The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Another Perspective

Guilty in Defense

How innocent are those who knew they could count on American and British kindheartedness?

(Page 3 of 3)

br> Whiles yet the cool and temperate wind of grace br> O'erblows the filthy and contagious clouds br> Of heady murder, spoil, and villainy. . . br> What say you? will you yield, and this avoid? br> Or, guilty in defence, be thus destroyed? /em> [ HV , III.3.88-126] /p>

When Michael Pennington presented the play on the British stage back in the eighties, he let out a huge sigh of relief when Harfleur subsequently capitulated, as if to indicate that these blood-curdling threats had all been a gigantic bluff -- a view of the matter born out by his subsequent instructions to his occupying troops as they were about to enter the town to "use mercy to them all" as well as by his subsequent precept given to Fluellen (III.6) "that in our marches through the country there be nothing compelled from the villages, nothing taken but paid for, none of the French upbraided or abused in disdainful language. For when lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner."

All very admirable, no doubt, and a good motto for our troops in Iraq. Yet there is also an important point made by the idea of the weak being "guilty in defense" against the strong when they have no chance of winning. Although as it turned out the Iraqis could depend on American and British tender-heartedness, it would be a poor rule of warfare that did not recognize the greater probability of one's enemy's offering no quarter. After all, it was a British Admiral, John "Jacky" Fisher, who said that "the essence of war is violence; moderation in war is imbecility." In doing so he was expressing also the philosophy of the American General William T. Sherman.

Thus it would be, to say the least, unwise to take up arms in a hopeless cause in the expectation that one's enemy will prove imbecilic. Would it also be criminal? Fortunately, it now looks as if we shan't have to answer that question. The Iraqi people now dancing in the streets really do appear to be innocents. Let's hope they are content to remain so.

Page:   1 23

topics:
Military, Iraq, Oil

About the Author

James Bowman, our movie and culture critic, is a resident scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is the author of Honor: A History and Media Madness: The Corruption of Our Political Culture, both published by Encounter Books.

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by James Bowman

More Articles From Another Perspective

http://spectator.org/archives/2003/04/10/guilty-in-defense

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Warren Pulls Even

W. James Antle, III | 11:57AM

Warren Pulls Even with Brown in New Poll

Aaron Goldstein | 9:58AM

Obama at the Academy

Ross Kaminsky | 9:32AM

RET on C-SPAN

TAS Staff | 12:42AM

Romney Ahead in Florida

Larry Thornberry | 5.23.12

Quigley's Quixotic Defense of Liz Warren

Aaron Goldstein | 5.23.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Why I Won't Sign Up for Facebook

Aaron Goldstein | 5.22.12

A Tsunami of Bad Economics

Ryan Young | 5.23.12

Nobody Pushed Tyler Clementi

Ross Kaminsky | 5.23.12

Mitt's Mistake

Jeffrey Lord | 5.22.12

Ted Kennedy's Anti-Mormon Moment

Daniel Allott | 5.23.12

A Facebook Marriage

Russ Ferguson | 5.22.12

ADVERTISEMENT