The American Spectator

p> DOVE AT FIRST SIGHT br> The saying goes, “You dance with who brung ‘ya.” So is that why Democrats in the Senate and the House continue to use discredited former Clinton Defense Secretary Bill Perry , Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and and national security adviser Sandy Berger as their brain trust to counter the Bush Administration on defense, international and security issues? /p>

The three former Clintonistas have been meeting fairly regularly with the Democratic leadership of both houses, even advising House leader Nancy Pelosi on what some Democratic House leadership staffers say were more than 35 drafts of the speech she is expected to make to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York this Friday.

“Whoever is saying that, it’s just sour grapes,” says a Pelosi staffer in her congressional office. “This is a representative who served on the House Intelligence Committee. She doesn’t need to crib from others for her speeches.”

Still, she and other Democratic leaders do appear to be leaning on the few recent foreign policy hands. Pelosi, especially, has been looking to Albright for backup in her tussle with her Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, who has been agitating for the party to be more hawkish on Iraq.

But the presence of the Clinton retreads grates with others. “You look at Iraq and North Korea and these are the people who created the problems,” says a hawkish Democratic Senate staffer. “Why the hell are we listening to what they have to say?”

Part of the reason for the presence of the former Clinton cabinet members is concern among the Democratic leadership that too few of their membership carry any serious weight with the American public when it comes to foreign policy issues.