Barbour has been systematically traveling the state building support for a run. He wisely stepped out of the limelight late last year when Sen. Trent Lott created a furor over comments he made about Sen. Strom Thurmond, and didn’t get roped into the internal Mississippi debate that ensued on Lott.
“Barbour’s clean on that front,” says a political consultant who has done work in Mississippi. “He’s a much better politician than he was twenty years ago when he last ran for political office, and he’s got a real shot at winning this thing.” Barbour ran for the Senate in 1982 and lost.
Musgrove, while popular, has overseen record budget deficits despite all the federal dollars that Republican Senators Lott and Thad Cochran keep pouring into the state for business development. Barbour is said to have already been amassing a war chest to finance a run, and unlike other candidates who must travel around the country to fundraise for campaigns, Barbour can draw on extensive contacts he has cultivated with bigwig Republican donors ever since his time as RNC chair.
“He’s certainly a national candidate, who will make this race a national race in the media and elsewhere,” says the consultant. “Barbour should make this race fun.”
p> LAST SHALL BE FIRST br> Sen.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?