(Page 5 of 7)
/p> p> IS BIOLOGY DESTINY? br> Re: Frederick W. Larsen, M.D.'s "Artificial Fertilization" letter in Reader Mail's Addicted to the Democrats : /p>I have no desire to dispute any of Dr. Larsen's points but to introduce one of my own.
Evolutionarily speaking, when we artificially produce offspring of couples who are naturally infertile, are we not creating another generation of people who will tend to have the same problem, and who will in turn require (to greater or lesser extent), the same assistance? Ignoring for a time the emotional side of the issue, are we not thereby inadvertently increasing the occurrence of genetic flaws?
p>Or to put it more popularly: If your parents didn't have any children (by natural means), is it not probable that you won't have any? br> -- Richard Donley /p> p> THE BLOODY BRUTAL FRENCH
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.