ONE SHARPTON COOKIE
Re: The Washington Prowler's Moseley
on Down:
I think the Prowler must have missed the news of several weeks
ago, that Donna Brazile was planning to recruit high-profile black
candidates to run as "favorite sons" (and daughters) in order to
deny Al Sharpton delegates.
-- Jameson Campaigne
Ottawa, IL
Donna Brazile's involvement with Carol Moseley-Braun's campaign for
president has Clinton's fingerprints all over it: Al Sharpton would
siphon off many African-American votes, which are the majority of
the Democratic constituency, so how better to block Sharpton than
with Moseley-Braun, another African-American, who then would turn
her votes over to the winner of the Democrats primary with a
promise of some high profile job "befitting her regal
attitude."
-- Cari Gravellinini
Boston, MA
Interesting article about Moseley-Braun deciding to run for
president rather than Senate. It seems to me the obvious answer to
the why of her decision is three-fold. First, it has probably been
made clear to her that she would have little chance in a Senate
race and would not be receiving the necessary financial backing;
second, she will get more media exposure running for President and
she has always seemed like a person who craves that; and third,
probably the most important and the reason Brazile is advising her,
is to dilute the black vote going to Al Sharpton. By splitting the
black vote, neither even gives the appearance of being a viable
candidate. Can you imagine the mess the Democrats will find them in
if Sharpton wins some of the primaries when the rather large field
splits much of the white Democratic primary vote? I don't think
that is an unreasonable prospect, particularly in some Southern
states. Just a thought.
-- Lynn Holman
Black Mountain, NC
The next presidential election represents an opportunity for the
Democrats to prove their devotion to blacks and black issues in
America. They have two surprisingly strong and popular candidates,
Al Sharpton for President and Carol Moseley-Braun for Vice
President. There is still much hatred of blacks in the party and
these two fine folks would have to overcome that to win. Further,
there might be some merit in the argument that the Californians
will raise about reversing the order. I do hope the Democrats won't
simply reject this strong ticket out of hand simply because these
Americans are black.
-- unsigned
C-SPANNED
Re: Reid Collins's Thank
God for C-Span:
Reid Collins's column asks why the Washington peace rally's
podium program went unreported. I have been searching all over the
Internet for a transcript of the speeches. I'm amazed -- I can't
find one. Why doesn't someone do this?
-- Larry Boeskool
There is no God to thank for C-SPAN -- only the liberals who
program it. Without C-SPAN, Americans would not only get fair and
balanced news and events, it would be a better place to live. I say
Thank God for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill
O'Reilly and Fox News.
-- Jill Lawless
Canyon Lake, TX
OUTTA HERE
Re: George Neumayr's Phony
Pacifists:
Strike one: Saddam attacks Iran when he perceives that they are vulnerable. Several million men die.
Strike two: Saddam attacks Kuwait when he perceives they are defenseless. Only God knows how many died.
Strike three: ...wait, this ain't baseball. No strike three for Saddam.
If anyone thinks this man is not dangerous just look at his
history. He has proved over and over that he is dangerous to his
neighbors, dangerous to his own people, dangerous even to his own
family. The U.S. should take him out now before he perceives that
someone else is vulnerable. Let Le Carré et al. squeal about
oil. They are fools, who should be politely listened to, patted
gently on the head, offered a cup of tea and sent on their way.
-- unsigned
A FRIEND WRITES
Re: Mark Goldblatt's Keeping
It Real:
Your article, "Keeping It Real" is one of the most vile, despicable attacks on African Americans I have ever come across.