12.27.02 @ 4:07PM
No surprises here, though imagine the surprises they have in store for us.
It's an awesome undertaking, this hunt for an Enemy of the Year
fox. Yet where would we be if we didn't ride with our hounds?
Dozens of e-mailed denunciations have filtered into our data bank,
which now rivals in size the 12,000 pages the Iraqis dumped on
December 8. Unlike Saddam's filibuster, our store of information
even contains nuggets of substance. That's the scary part. These
perps are real. Their main crime might be that they're all old hat,
acts as tired as Lillian Hellman's famously aged face. No one had
to round up the usual suspects. They'd never left last year's
holding cell. It's an act of mercy just to deal with them again.
They're finalists by definition. They seem to live to be chased.
We're the real victims.
And so let's trot them out again, starting with the exciting,
charismatic likes of Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, James Earl Carter,
Chuck Schumer, Pat Leahy, Phil Donahue, Carville & Begala,
Jesse Jackson, Terry McAuliffe and a cartload or two of other
yada-yadas tipsily steered by the Rev. Bill Moyers. Special thanks
to the bug sprayer who remembered to nominate Sidney
Blumenthal.
Meanwhile, not even a fortnight after he quit the presidential
chase, Al Gore is all but forgotten, appearing on no more than two
suspect ballots, in final confirmation of Enemy Central's ability
to scare off voters. By contrast, Bill and Hill show up in almost
every denunciation, often more than once, sometimes with the
suggestion they be named Enemies of the Year, Decade, Century, and
Millennium in perpetuity. For starters. You know the Democratic
Party is in trouble when Enemy Central starts facing an enemy
shortage.
These are times that require creative solutions. One such is to
search out a Friend of the Year. One voter does just that by paying
homage to the "anonymous genius among the Democrats who organized
that lovely 'memorial' tribute to Sen. Paul Wellstone." But for
that today "Walter Mondull" would be controlling the Senate for his
party. Soon enough, alas, that same voter loses his ability to
smile, as he quickly hands out the "Support of Murderous Dictators
Award" to Susan Sarandon, Woody Harrelson and Sean Penn, among
other "Hollywood ding-dongs." In sealing the deal on the limits of
friendship, he notes that "'Our Friends the Saudis' have excelled
this year as Enemies." How long before they circulate in President
Bush's Axis?
Trent Lott was recommended for further punishment, which is so
unfair and inhuman it has inspired us to come up with a
constructive approach to the Patty Murray situation. Sure she
hasn't received the attention she deserves for declaring herself a
founding member of the Osama bin Laden harem. But remember, we need
to think creatively. The old, unimaginative way would be to treat
her like Trent Lott and force her to step down. However, a new,
fresh approach would be to insist on giving the gal a promotion. If
Lott had to step down as Senate Republican leader, Murray must be
allowed to step up as next Senate Democratic leader. Punishment
must fit the crime. We'll have her where we want her, except, of
course, on those secret getaway weekends that she and sweet Osama
will be looking to share.
In victory corner we espy not only the barely peaceable David
Bonior and Jim McDermott, who earned bonus frequent flyer miles on
Iraqi Air this year, but mighty Generals Eric Shinseki and James
Jones, whose tank tracks were all over a recent Washington
Post story predicting that fighting in Iraq would be terribly
difficult for America's fighting men. Now we know why Gen. Shinseki
once wanted to dress the army's finest in black berets: they were
to be a prelude to black armbands and whatever other signs of
mourning America's military can carry into combat. He's the kind of
commander who would have declared, "We shall not return" and "Full
speed in reverse." When everyone's gone AWOL he announces his units
to be in "fighting trim." That's the skinny on Shinseki.
Liberal media bias gave way this year to liberal media bigotry,
all of it personified by one lowly scribe, Ms. Dana Milbank, who
sank to the top of Washington's oldest profession the other day
with this offering: "Compassionate Agenda Lags: So far, Bush has
yet to help the disadvantaged, even with victories on foreign,
security and fiscal policy." What a cheap thing to say,
particularly when someone as disadvantaged as Milbank has been able
to take full advantage. If she weren't such a spoiled brat, Maureen
Dowd could give Milbank a run for the money. But at her own paper
she's been overshadowed by Paul Krugman, which means she might soon
go the way of Bob Herbert or Anthony Lewis. No prizes here.
Which brings us to the crowning moment we've been dreading. Do
we really have to go ahead with this? Hasn't fox hunting been
outlawed? We were happier during Campaign 2002, when many a
Democrat would come to her for campaign loot, but only if no
photographer was in the room. Her husband continues to hog the
spotlight, but she's the one a CNN-Time poll now declares the
leading Democratic contender for the 2004 presidential nomination.
That same poll showed runners-up Kerry and Lieberman losing by huge
numbers in a matchup against the Republican incumbent president.
Strangely, predictably, CNN-Time neglected to ask respondents how
the poll's purported top Democrat would fare against Bush. That's
the way she's always gotten ahead: too many questions left unasked
let alone unanswered. Now she wants to dress Republicans in white
sheet uniforms. And she's driven enough to think she has a future
that might include bringing Al Gore back to serve as her number
two. So she's the one, the EOW of the Year. You know her name. You
pronounce it. Now let us be. We've got new worries: What if Hillary
decides to clone herself?
topics:
Hollywood, Law, Military, Iraq, Oil