(Page 2 of 3)
It also wasn’t clear that Nickles was sticking his neck out for someone else — despite what the Washington Post was reporting in Monday editions. Under that scenario, Nickles was doing heavy lifting for Sen. Mitch McConnell or Frist, both of whom, some analysts think, might not be positioned or want to be positioned to alienate potential votes inside the caucus.
But those in the know with Nickles say the senator wasn’t doing anyone’s dirty work. Rather, he was simply doing what was best for the GOP. “When everything is said and done, people today might be mad at Nickles for taking the first swipe at Lott, but history will show he did the right thing,” says a staffer for a Western state Republican senator. “Someone had to get the ball rolling, as distasteful as it may be. There is a political component here that had to be addressed by the caucus. We all know Lott is a good man, honorable. But we’re standing on quicksand now, and if we didn’t do something, we’d be stuck in the muck for two years. There is always the chance that Lott could survive, but he will do so because the caucus met.”
Going into Monday night, it seemed Lott’s survival would depend on a superb performance on Black Entertainment Television, and then several news cycles with little or no coverage over the Christmas holidays. That combination perhaps would allow Lott to enter the January 6th caucus meeting with a stronger hand than he currently holds. It’s that possibility that has kept many Republican senators on the fence thus far.
“Lott is still leader, he’s still got a lot of influence up here, and there are still a lot of people on Capitol Hill, in the Senate, who think he can survive this thing. No one, not other senators, not staffers, wants to be so far out on the limb that Lott can saw them off if he holds on,” says a Republican Senate staffer.
Early reviews of his Monday appearance on BET were not good. He was evasive on several questions, including his position on the Martin Luther King holiday, and would not cite issues besides segregation that might have given Southerners in 1948 reason to support Strom Thurmond’s presidential run.
As a result, expect to hear rumblings that Republicans are trying to move up the caucus meeting date, perhaps pre-Christmas. Such a plan, from a coordination standpoint, would be difficult: few Senators are currently in Washington and fewer want to return for what is sure to be one of the most contentious caucus meetings in recent history. Several things appear certain, however:
• Despite all of the talk of Frist, Nickles and McConnell, there almost certainly is a darkhorse candidate who will further cloud the picture if Lott’s situation deteriorates in the next couple of days.
• At least one pundit — Larry King, anyone? — will utter the name John McCain as a prospective leadership candidate.
• Rhode Island moderate Republican Lincoln Chafee is feeling awfully cushy in the cat bird seat right now as both parties go out of their way to prove that they are his new best friend. Should Lott decide he wants nothing to do with the Senate once this ordeal is over, Chafee is suddenly the swing vote for majority control.p> KING PUTZ br> Speaking of Larry King , the CNN host had an opportunity to do a live show Monday evening that might have included an appearance with Trent Lott
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?