The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Washington Prowler
Print Email
Text Size

Washington Prowler

Lottomania

How to remove Trent Lott but retain the Senate. PLUS: Al Gore's real reason for quitting.

(Page 2 of 2)

"It was clear that Lott was simply stalling for time. That's the game right now," says a Senate staffer in Washington. "He's trying to play out the string, get to whatever day his Black Entertainment interview might occur, and hope something else replaces this story in the headlines."

But that's probably not going to happen, if some Senators have their way. Last Thursday and Friday, members of the Republican Senate leadership were mapping out how best to approach Lott so that he would be willing to step aside as leader but remain in the Senate to ensure GOP control. (Mississippi has a Democratic governor who presumably would appoint a Democrat to replace Lott should Lott resign from the Senate.)

Lott's taking full leave of Capitol Hill was actually raised by Lott himself in a Thursday evening call to the White House, according to one White House source: "Lott wasn't making demands, but was clear that at that point, his mind was set on either remaining as leader or resigning from the Senate and losing the majority. There was no half-deal to be struck."

But White House congressional liaison Nick Calio has suggested to Karl Rove that Lott does not want to go down in Republican lore as a man who lost the majority for the party twice, and that Lott can probably find a satisfactory way to stay on without being leader.

Over the weekend, it was determined by Senate Republicans that the best way to approach a Lott removal was by calling for a new round of elections for leadership positions. Lott had made a point of calling for early caucus elections after the November general elections, in part to avoid a challenge from the likes of Sens. Don Nickles or Mitch McConnell.

"Lott is trying to avoid a caucus meeting, a caucus vote at all cost," says a senior Senate leadership staffer. "He knows that if the caucus gets together, all that's required is a motion and several seconds from the floor and a new round of votes could occur."

Yet being removed as leader by colleagues in a new vote would allow Lott to save face in a way that resigning under pressure would not. It would free him to remain in the Senate and not jeopardize the GOP's majority position.

The caucus game plan appeared to play out on Sunday, as Nickles called for new elections and several other Republicans seemed to indicate they would be supportive of that.

"Now it's just wait and see," says the leadership staffer. "But it's clear that Lott's mea culpas just aren't enough now."

Page:   12

topics:
Books, NATO

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by The Prowler

More Articles From Washington Prowler

http://spectator.org/archives/2002/12/16/lottomania

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Losing the World to Win Reelection

Jed Babbin | 5.21.12

Why I Won't Sign Up for Facebook

Aaron Goldstein | 5.22.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Mormons and Demons

Jeremy Lott | 5.21.12

You Say You Want An Evolution?

J.T. Young | 5.21.12

A Pig's Breakfast

Larry Thornberry | 5.21.12

Mitt's Mistake

Jeffrey Lord | 5.22.12

ADVERTISEMENT