By Jed Babbin on 11.5.02 @ 12:03AM
The liberals' use of environmental laws to shut down the military has reached alarming levels.
The left's goal of disarming America hasn't made much progress
in Congress or the White House since Lil' Billy left town. But the
libs' success in court using the environmental laws to shut down
the military has reached an alarming level. At the voting booth
today Americans will decide whether the anti-military left will
continue to succeed at forcing America to disarm unilaterally
through environmental litigation.
Controlling the Senate means controlling the appointment of
federal judges and the power to relieve the Defense Department of
some of the insidious effects of the environmental laws. Since the
mid-1990s the Jane Fonda Democrats -- in their new fashionable
guise of enviro-whackos -- have scored one success after another in
their effort to limit what the military can do. Even the Marines at
Camp Pendleton can't walk or pitch their tents just anywhere,
because they are under court restraints to protect endangered
critters and plants. Now that there's a war on, you'd think the
enviros would have to take a back seat. And you'd be wrong. Two
court decisions, one of which came down late last week, show what
judges are doing at the behest of lefties such as the National
Resources Defense Council.
In the submarine business, silence is golden. Until the Walker
family spy ring gave most of it away, our sub technology reduced
the noise our subs emitted to such a degree that our attack boats
could hunt and kill any Soviet missile boat with little danger of
being detected. Now, the Russians and others are building
extraordinarily quiet nuclear and diesel-electric subs that we
can't detect nearly as easily. SURTASS -- the new Surveillance
Towed Array Sensor System -- is an active low-frequency sonar that
can detect the newer quiet enemy submarines at great distance.
According to an affidavit signed by Adm. Nathman, Deputy Chief of
Naval Operations, the threat posed by these subs is at the "very
top of those facing the U.S. Navy," "presenting a clear and present
danger in crucial parts of the world including the Persian Gulf,
along the Korean Peninsula, and in the Taiwan Strait." The Natural
Resources Defense Council sued to prohibit all peacetime use of
SURTASS. In the NRDC's view, because it is an active sonar, SURTASS
can hurt the hearing of whales and other protected marine species.
But SURTASS, noisy as it is, isn't disturbing a silent ocean.
We need to remember that Mother Nature is a noisy old broad.
Even underwater, earthquakes, surface lightning strikes and other
frequent natural events create ear-shattering noise. Despite this
noise, whales and every other creature seem to be able to breed and
feed. But the environmental laws are so strict that they stop the
show even when applied by good judges such as Magistrate Elizabeth
LaPorte.
The NRDC showed that lunkheads at the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), in giving the Navy permission to use SURTASS,
failed to consider things like the grounding of a bunch of whales
in the Bahamas, which might have been related to use of another,
very different type of sonar. And why are the NMFS nitwits in
charge of the Navy's ability to use sonar at sea? Because the
environmental laws put the civilian agencies in charge. Judge
LaPorte did what she could, and only blocked the Navy from using
SURTASS in peacetime, and only in areas where whales congregate
most. Bad as that is, it's not half as bad as when one of Lil'
Billy's anti-military judges gets hold of a case like this. Like
when a D.C. federal judge stopped the Navy from bombing Nothing
Atoll.
Just like NMFS controls permits for use of SURTASS, the National
Fish and Wildlife Service rules over the Navy/Marine bombing range
at tiny Farallon de Medinilla, about 200 acres of coral in the
middle of nowhere, 150 miles north of Guam. FDM has only two
noticeable characteristics. First, it is the home of many
unendangered migratory birds, such as the red-footed
booby. Second, and not very important to the NRDC or the judge, for
the past 25 years it's been the place where Marine and Navy
aviators assigned to the Pacific Fleet can practice in unlimited
airspace with the green faces and SEALs on the ground. It's one of
the few places in the world where you can fly at any speed or
altitude, in any formation, and use live ordnance, including
precision-guided munitions.
The Center for Biological Diversity (the name says it all) sued
to close the range because the Navy's permit from the Fish and
Wildlife Service doesn't account for the unintentional killing of
any birds. Because of that Judge Emmett Sullivan -- a Clinton boyo
if ever there was one -- told the Navy it couldn't bomb FDM at
all.
I have been in or around the military all my life, and never
before have I seen statements by senior officers like those I read
in the FDM case. Before the injunction was issued, the Navy
submitted an affidavit signed by Marine Lt. Gen. James Cartwright,
then commander of the First Marine Aircraft Wing. Gen. Cartwright's
affidavit said that FDM was the "only target range in the Pacific
Theater" where strike aircraft can do the unlimited training they
need to be ready to fight. Judge Sullivan closed FDM anyway,
apparently not caring that we are at war, or that those Marines
could be headed into action any day.
In a later affidavit, this time submitted to the appeals court,
Gen. Cartwright detailed the effect of FDM's closure on one of the
squadrons denied training by Judge Sullivan's order. He said, "The
squadron's lost training opportunity at FDM has degraded its
readiness and thereby dramatically increased aircrew risk and the
likelihood of mission failure should it be ordered into combat
tomorrow." Gen. Cartwright obviously is misguided. He apparently
thinks the lives of his pilots and defeating the enemy are more
important than blowing up a few red-footed boobies. (General, you
clearly don't understand Congress. But I'll buy you the best steak
and the best bottle of wine at The Palm any day you want it.)
The appeals court temporarily set aside Judge Sullivan's order,
but it's less than even money that it will reverse his decision.
More of these cases are being filed, and more will stop essential
military activities. We are at war, dammit, and anti-military
people like the NRDC, CBD and Judge Sullivan should not be able to
use the environmental laws to endanger pilots or raise the chance
that we won't win a fight.
Only Congressional action can stop this idiocy. DoD's actions
should not ignore the environment altogether. But different
standards must be in place, and civilian agencies such as the Fish
and Wildlife and NMFS can't control these decisions. So long as Tom
Daschle is in charge of the Senate, this will continue, and get
worse. Think about that while you watch the election returns
tonight. Saddam delendus est.
topics:
Business, Environment, Law, Military, Russia