But again Gore’s timing couldn’t be worse. Already every major Democratic presidential candidate has laid down his take on what President Bush and the U.S. should do with Iraq, and almost all of them, from Lieberman to Edwards to Gephardt (let’s forget the milquetoast Daschle and peacenik Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont), have taken a more hawkish stand than Gore himself took earlier this year in a speech before the Council of Foreign Relations.
At that point Gore indicated that his approach to Iraq would be very different from Bush’s, even though Bush’s team had to lay out a clear plan to take out Saddam. Now that Bush has, Gore’s problems have only multiplied. Not only will he have to clarify his own muddled record on Iraq going back to eight feckless years under Clinton-Gore. He’ll also have to say something that the American people haven’t already heard on at least four other occasions in the past two weeks. And he’ll have to make those points better than Edwards and Lieberman, both of whom spoke more eloquently than Gore ever can.
This is where being his own man comes into it the equation. Whereas in the past few months Gore has been drafting speeches with his own, let’s call it, “unique” take on issues, for the Commonwealth Club address Gore has been huddling with his old foreign policy guru Leon Fuerth, who served as his national security adviser in the White House.
The fact that Fuerth is apparently so involved would indicate that Gore, while generally being supportive of action against Iraq, will take Fuerth’s position: that quick, unilateral action would be potentially difficult for the U.S., thus putting American lives in harm’s way, and that the administration should instead use U.N. inspections and internal Iraqi political operatives to press the issue of a government overthrow.
“He’s in a real spot,” says a former Gore adviser. “Most of his competitors in 2004 have already come out in, at the least, general support of the President’s position. If he does simply that, he looks like a follower, not a leader. But I can’t believe he’ll stray so far into Fuerth’s orbit that he looks like he doesn’t support his country’s position at all. He knows that his putting full faith in the U.N. won’t wash with the American public.”p> BARON FIELD br> Word out of Texas is that Fred Baron
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?