The American Spectator

Reader Mail

(Page 3 of 10)

I'm glad to see SOMEBODY in a conservative publication say what John Corry did.

Personally, I can't work up much enthusiasm for a war against Iraq. It seems the reasoning behind it is, "We want to fight somebody, so who can we fight next? Iraq, I guess." That's no way to decide on war.

If Iraq is developing nuclear capabilities (again), I think we should resort to limited strikes, like the Israelis' attack on the nuclear reactor. We don't have to always think in terms of all-out war.

p>Ultimately, if we want to fight Al Qaeda, the best way would be to support Israel to the hilt, a hundred times more than before -- that's the best way to spoil Bin Laden's beer. br> -- Larry Eubank br> Lgeub@cs.com /p> p> TALKING POINTS TALK br> Re: Wlady Pleszczynski's Memo to Marshall : /p> p>The phrase became famous actually when Monica Lewinsky handed a "talking points memo," as the media constantly called it, to Linda Tripp. Speculation was that Bruce Lindsey wrote it, but Lewinsky claimed she wrote it herself and that was never disproved. It's a generic phrase anyway, so I think the whole thing is pretty silly really.

topics:
Taxes, Business, Environment, Hollywood, Law, Military, Iraq, Israel, Oil