Washington — How did the Prohibitionists take the news? I am thinking of the Prohibitionists, who are patrolling our diets and lifestyles always with their loyal servitors, the trial lawyers, at their side. The news I have in mind is that George W. Bush, arch typical middle-aged Americano, has just passed his physical with glowing marks. His heart rate is that of a varsity athlete, 44 beats a minute. He runs seven-minute miles. His total cholesterol level is 177, considered in the “desirable” range. His body fat is 14.5 percent. He achieved all this without benefit of the Prohibitionists, and despite an occasional cigar.
The vigorous President has taken personal responsibility for his diet and his lifestyle. He did not need the Prohibitionists’ remonstrances. He once drank too much. Without benefit of the Prohibitionists he cut out the booze and picked up the personal training regimen. The consequence is that he is fit, beyond the dreams of any Prohibitionist or trial lawyer ever heard of. Yet these congenital snoops tell us that there is the Other America. It is a land where “obesity in children has tripled in the past twenty years. A staggering 50 percent of adolescents in some minority populations are overweight….Heart attacks may become a disease of young adults.” That is how two health busybodies from Yale University and Harvard Medical School put it in the Washington Post last June.
Their solution is to hound the food industry. They want it to cut back its government lobbying, its advertisements to children, and its distribution of foods they deem unwholesome. The “food industry,” they warn, “spends an estimated $10 billion to influence the eating behavior of children.” So now here come the Prohibitionists after fast food or “junk food,” and this is but the latest assault on American industry and private citizens. The campaign will get worse. In New York City last month lawyer Samuel Hirsch filed a class-action lawsuit against McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, and KFC Corporation, claiming his client became obese and ill because of the delicious products of these profitable corporations.
The scenario is precisely the same that was followed in pursuing the tobacco industry. Those who predicted that these Prohibitionists’ campaigns would spread from campaigns against tobacco to campaigns against other industries have been vindicated. Now it is the fast food industry that will be depicted as unscrupulous in its advertising and its health claims. Its executives will be called before government bodies. Company documents will be scrutinized and the industry demonized, which is not that difficult. Is there an industry in the land that does not have critics insisting that the industry is up to no good?
There will also be the public statements of the woebegone of this Other America. The trial lawyers and Prohibitionists will come up with such sad sacks as Caesar Barber. He is the complainant in Hirsch’s suit. He says of his numerous health problems, “I trace it all back to the high fat, grease and salt, all back to McDonald’s Wendy’s, Burger King.”
Allow me to recommend to Mr. Barber the splendid figure of Our President. He is precisely Barber’s age, 56. He took stock of his health a decade or so back and did not need lawyers or Prohibitionists to tell him what was necessary. He demonstrated personal responsibility and he is now in the pink. He did not need more government regulation and higher excise taxes to direct him towards a better diet and towards exercise. Yet more government regulation and taxation are what the Prohibitionists demand. Ironically the result will be not be a leaner America, but a more corrupt American, if the tobacco scenario taught us anything.
Regulated industries are always subject to the corrupt practices of pressure groups. Substances burdened with high excise taxes are always subject to bootleggers. Given the disparity of onerous taxes on tobacco among the states and municipalities organized crime is now extending its grip on tobacco sales. Just as the Prohibitionists of the 1920s were the Mafia’s best friend, history is repeating itself today as the Prohibitionists’ taxes on tobacco widen the opportunities for Mafia bootleggers to take over tobacco distribution. When the states start imposing more regulation and taxes on junk food the opportunities for corruption will multiply.
Yet, as the robust George W. Bush demonstrates, if we take personal responsibility for our diet we will not need the Prohibitionists, the trial lawyers, and now — as I hope I have demonstrated — another of their allies, the Mafia.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online