7.22.02 @ 12:03AM
Congress is busily passing all sorts of half-way anti-corporate malfeasance measures. High time it got serious.
Congress -- or at least some of its members -- is enjoying an
orgy of outrage over some cases of corporate malfeasance. Amidst
all the finger-wagging and thunder of its hearings, that august
body seems not to have noticed that there is something on the order
of four million corporations in the nation, of which perhaps 2,000
might be classified as "big" and, of these, a bare handful have
caused the ruckus. Never mind. The Democrats, thinking they can
blame the Republicans for anything that goes wrong, are in ecstasy
over this, and the congressional Republicans, fearful the nonsense
coming from the Democrats will stick, are outbidding their rivals
for toughness on corporate chieftains who go wrong.
Congress is passing bills, some of which will doubtless make
matters worse over the long run. In any case, longer sentences for
white-collar criminals and setting up a federal accounting
oversight board are halfway measures. What is needed is an all-out
congressional effort to eliminate greed. That is not too much to
ask of a body that has managed to redesign our automobiles several
times.
The bill to stamp out greed should start in the Senate, where so
much virtue and principle reside. It should be simple and direct:
Greed is outlawed, period. A special Anti-Greed Board will be
created by the legislation. The board will leave it to federal
bureaucrats to decide what constitutes greed at any particular
moment. Thus, objective administration of the legislation will be
assured.
Senator Daschle, as the majority leader, is the one who should
announce the legislative campaign. His mien is often grave, as
suits this serious matter. As we have seen in recent months, he is
always Gravely Concerned about whatever it is President Bush is
proposing that week.
The bill should pass both houses quickly and by large margins.
Some Republican sticklers might claim that it violates the
constitutional requirement that all bills involving federal funds
must originate in the House. They might speculate that pork barrel
handouts to arcane locale projects by various members could be
construed as examples of greed on the part of said members (i.e.,
buying votes). No matter. The Democrats will make mincemeat of
anyone who quibbles about the constitutionality of the bill.
Quibblers will be labeled pro-greed. In an election year, who needs
that?
It's too bad that Congress, while they're at it, can't stamp out
greed retroactively. Consider the possibilities:
• Senator and Mrs. Daschle would have settled on living on
his Senate salary instead of Mrs. D. going to work as a
transportation lobbyist pushing bills on which the senator
votes.
• Democratic National Chairman Terry McAuliffe, instead of
pocketing millions from his cozy relationship with the former
chairman of defunct Global Crossing, would have donated it to the
Little Sisters of the Poor.
• The folks who ran Arthur Andersen would have been
content with good salaries as accountants, instead of mega-fees
from acting as management consultants to the same clients they
audited.
• Bernie Ebbers would have bought fewer giant cattle
ranches and paid back the $400 million he borrowed from his
company, WorldCom.
• Those Enron executives who cooked up the off-books
partnerships which led to the company's ruin, would have settled
for comfortable houses in the suburbs instead of McMansions and
millions in stock options.
• Back in 1996, the Messrs. Clinton and Gore would have
settled for campaigning on the issues instead of hustling
contributions from the Chinese Communists, Indonesian gardeners and
Thai bag ladies.
• ImClone's Dr. Waksal wouldn't have engaged in insider
trading of his stock and thus would still be on the New York party
circuit instead of sitting in jail.
• Martha Stewart wouldn't have worried about selling her
ImClone stock before it imploded, so could have finished making
that salad on television without all those distracting
questions.
What a breath of fresh air this legislation will be for the
whole nation. President Bush will sign the bill in the blink of an
eye. Then Congress, having disposed of greed once and for all, can
turn its attention to doing something about the weather.
topics:
Transportation, Television, Books, Constitution, Law, NATO