"Pitt is taking the heat, but all of these companies flourished and grew under the Clinton SEC's watch. If Democrats are going to try to pin the 'corporate greed' label on us, we want to have the ammo to throw it back in their faces," says a Republican staffer on the House Financial Services Committee.
There is internal debate among Republicans whether or not Levitt should be invited before House and Senate committees to outline how it was that companies like WorldCom and Global Crossing passed so easily through what little SEC oversight might actually have taken place.
Since leaving the SEC, Levitt has traveled the country and published extensively on the need for greater oversight of corporate America. The media have portrayed his time as SEC chair as that of a white knight battling against the evils of Wall Street excess and Republican attempts to de-regulate the securities industry. Some Republicans wonder if putting Levitt under a spotlight might not backfire, by making it appear that Republicans are simply trying to shift blame. "You can only blame the Clinton Administration so much," says a Republican Senate staffer working on the Finance Committee. "This might be one of those cases where we keep quiet to fight another day."
Others, though, want history righted, at least to their way of thinking. "Levitt has come out of these scandals unscathed, and it's irksome," says the House staffer. "Democrats worked hard to make sure many of these companies that are now in question got special consideration over at the SEC. And we weren't in charge back then. No one was paying attention then. Now, somehow it's all our fault."
p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.