(Page 3 of 6)
br> San Antonio, TX /p>How apt that such parallel events should be unfolding at the 30-year mark for Watergate:
Then: Democratic strategic data (paper files). Now: Republican strategic data (computer files).
Then: An office in the Washington Watergate hotel. Now: A computer in the Washington Hay-Adams Hotel (American Prowler, 24 June 2002).
Then: "A third rate burglary" (White House spokesman Ron Ziegler, 1972). Now: "Next time they lose something, let's hope it's a bit more sophisticated" (Democrat Maureen Dowd, N.Y. Times, 16 June 2002).
Then: "I neither authorized nor encouraged subordinates to engage in illegal or improper campaign tactics" (Richard M. Nixon, 15 August, 1973). Now: "A Senate subordinate found a disk on a street corner" (Terry McAuliffe, et al., covering their tracks after the leak).
p>So, Daschle, McAuliffe, Dowd, Gore, N.Y. Times , Washington Post , CBS, what did you know and when did you know it? br> -- Scott Young /p>
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.