These are certainly weird times over at CNN, where heads are
rolling off the chopping block, sometimes without their owners even
knowing the ax is about to fall.
Earlier this year, former California Democratic Party hack
Bill Press, who some years ago signed on as the
liberal on CNN’s “Crossfire,” was jettisoned in favor of the
two-headed monster of James Carville and
Paul Begala. “He had no idea his contract wasn’t
going to be renewed. In fact, he’d been getting nothing but
positive feedback from his bosses,” says a current CNN staffer.
“Press was stunned when he heard about it.”
It appears that Press, who isn’t a reporter by training, missed
all the scuttlebutt flying around the office. “A lot of people here
in the Washington Bureau knew things were going to be shaken up on
‘Crossfire’ and that he was in trouble, but he seemed oblivious,”
the staffer says. “People around here were certainly talking about
it.”
The same cannot be said for what happened last week, when
another well-known CNNer, White House correspondent Major
Garrett, was unceremoniously dumped. Garrett was given no
advance word of his firing, nor was he given any specific reasons
why he was being let go. Staff weren’t told of Garrett’s exit until
they’d read the press release announcing his replacement: MSNBC
reporter Suzanne Malveaux.
Malveaux’s arrival is a bitter pill for longtime CNNers, says a
CNN news producer. “She was around the White House for MSNBC during
the Monica Lewinsky scandal. We couldn’t stand her. Given Garrett
or Malveaux, we’d take Garrett any time.”
Garrett, who often covered the White House beat as second banana
to senior correspondent John King, was a work
horse, providing on the ground reporting outside of Washington
during presidential trips, even contributing to CNN national radio
news broadcasts. “He was a real team player, too bad the owners
didn’t appreciate him,” says the producer.
Another CNN producer says there are rumors inside the building
that Garrett was axed because of concerns about his ideology.
Before arriving at CNN, Garrett was a reporter for U.S. News
& World Report and before that at the conservative
Washington Times. “The Times thing didn’t bother
them when they hired him,” says a CNN researcher. “But with Bush in
the White House, I think they were concerned he was going to be too
chummy with the conservatives. But I never saw any of that, and I
don’t even know that he was that conservative. If anything, Major
had better sources sometimes because of the impression he might be
conservative in that conservative White House.”
Part of the problem with the sudden exits, say CNN insiders, was
the retirement last year of longtime bureau chief Frank
Sesno, who targeted print reporters such as John King
(former AP reporter) and Garrett and turned them into TV reporters.
Sesno is credited with building up an esprit de corps in a bureau
that was best known as the D.C. perch for talkmeister Larry
King.
“All we were known for was Larry King and the shoutfests on
‘Crossfire,’” says the researcher. “Frank really made us into a
topflight network news bureau that competed with broadcast
networks. He made us legitimate and he defended the bureau from the
suits in [corporate headquarters] Atlanta.”
And once Sesno walked, the bureau became the plaything of
AOL-Time Warner executives like Walter Isaacson,
who lately has been spending increasing amounts of time in
Washington. “We’re all a little nervous now,” the researcher says.
“Every time he shows up, another head gets lopped off.”
With sudden departures from CNN becoming seemingly the norm,
additional rumors are beginning to spread, including one that has
longtime CNN talent Robert Novak considering an
exit. One of the founding hosts of “Crossfire” and the creator of
“The Capitol Gang,” Novak is said to be disenchanted with the newly
formatted “Crossfire” show and at the very least would like out of
that show.
“Everyone here thinks it’s funny that conservatives won’t go on
the show because they think Carville and Begala are unfair to
them,” says the CNN news producer. “When the real reason they
shouldn’t want to go on is because it’s just not very good.”
louis vuitton | 4.26.10 @ 10:49PM
wasn't it found years ago that abstinence from the consumption of red meat on one day a week was too great a burden for the laity?But again, the desire for unaccountability drives the argument. Marry them off, sanction the relief of their prostates and testes, and again we will have avoided the need to acknowledge another covenant broken. After all, canada goose Before the election it was all about clean energy. That message resonated with the entire left.