By James Bowman on 4.22.02 @ 12:02AM
Mira Sorvino is the only triumphant thing about this inept adaptation of a Marivaux play.
The Triumph of Love, a play by the 18th century French
playwright Marivaux, has been brought to the screen by Clare
Peploe, wife of Bernardo Bertolucci, who has writing and producing
credits on it. Despite the presence of the radiant Mira Sorvino and
the excellent Ben Kingsley and Fiona Shaw, I fear it is not quite
successful. The problem is that the film can do neither with nor
without the essential cruelty of the French original, and so
instead it tries (unsuccessfully) to soften or gloss over this
aspect of Marivaux's play. The alternative would be to make those
classic types from French comedy, the pedant and the mannish
spinster, as ridiculous as they would have been to contemporaries,
and there is never any question of doing that.
The story concerns a Prince, Agis (Jay Rodan), whose father has
been overthrown and killed while he is exiled to a country house in
the care of a philosopher-tutor called Hermocrates (Ben Kingsley)
and his sister Leontine (Fiona Shaw). When the usurper dies and
leaves the kingdom to his daughter, the Princess (Mira Sorvino),
she is remorseful about her father's conduct and determined to make
amends to the Prince. She has also, on a country excursion, spotted
the Prince bathing (a nice reversal of the conventions of the
classical and pastoral myths that are never far in the background)
and decided to marry him. But, of course, she must be the wooer,
which sets the tone for further sexual reversal as she is forced to
come to the austerely sexless house of Hermocrates in disguise as a
man.
But soon, through her aggressive flirtation with the one and
courtship of the other, she has both Hermocrates and his sister in
love with her, while the Prince Agis thinks that she is a male
friend to join in his sports -- including shooting arrows at an
effigy of the princess. For her, of course, it is a marvelously
"transgressive" moment (as they say these days), but the comedy of
it for us depends on our having an 18th century sense of
Hermocrates and Leontine as a fussy, vain, foolish and above all
aged pair, for whom being loved by either of the beautiful young
people played by the Princess would have been, to the audience
though not to them, ridiculous. Yet Ms. Peploe hasn't the nerve to
make them either very old or very ridiculous. How can we possibly
understand the exquisite comedy of Hermocrates's pause in the
middle of his love-talking to say: "My god, I'm behaving like an
idiot"? So far as we can see, he's not behaving like an idiot at
all.
Not only does this rather spoil the comedy of the thing, it also
runs the risk of making the Princess more calculating, more
heartless than we want her to be. The movie attempts to compensate
by showing us the poor Princess with a stricken look on her face
when she realizes she has made these poor people fall in love with
her, as if she had done so by inadvertence and not as part of a
deliberate strategy to attain her object of Agis. There are also a
couple of comic rustics who look badly out of place -- another
embarrassment from a former age when comedy consisted of laughing
at other people for being different. And the ending piles absurdity
on top of absurdity -- Leontine, good bluestocking that she is, is
supposed to find consolation in her discovery of electricity --
without ever managing to be funny.
In short, the movie is a mess, an incoherent mixture of styles
and points of view, and too rarely funny. It doesn't help that we
are allowed to glimpse a present-day audience on the lawn of the
period Tuscan mansion, Hermocrates's house, where the film is set.
It is a reminder that everything here, like the statuary, the
brocade, the costumes, the gardens, is period, is staged. At the
curtain call the cast appears in present-day dress just to
underline the point. Don't be frightened, children! The nice
teacher and the inventor lady weren't really humiliated by the
princess. It's OK to like her still. And, in fact, one does. For
those, like me, who have a hopeless crush on the beautiful Miss
Sorvino, the film is almost worth seeing just for her performance.
She has never been lovelier. Certainly, we may all feel as wise as
Hermocrates, who never for a moment believes in her masculine
disguise.
topics:
Sports, Law, Oil