Contrary to what you might have read, affirmative action hasn't gone away at the University of California. It just doesn't use the main entrance.
"Anyone not paying close attention could easily have missed the
news that minority admissions to the University of California
system, the nation's largest, have surpassed what they were before
UC banned racial preferences five years ago," editorialized the
Wall Street Journal on Monday.
This is Ward Connerly's "vindication," says the Journal. "Five
years ago, when public pressure forced university officials to
cease factoring race and ethnicity into the admissions process,
liberal defenders of group preferences issued dire warnings.
Minorities, they insisted, could not survive a system that wasn't
tilted in their favor. Ending affirmative action would 'turn back
the clock' and erase decades of academic gains, particularly for
blacks.
"Ward Connerly, the UC regent who led efforts to abolish the old
admissions system, is familiar enough with these doomsayings. Now
he can simply point to the numbers. 'I don't mean to gloat, but I
told you so,' Mr. Connerly told the Associated Press last week.
'We've been saying for a long time that these kids don't need any
special treatment to get into the UC system. They just need to work
hard, get fair treatment and have confidence in themselves. The
rest will take care of itself.'"
The Journal's editorial rightly notes that minorities can
succeed without racial preferences. But its interpretation of the
numbers fails to take into account the UC system's backdooring of
affirmative action since 1997.
The UC's initial response to the 1997 ban on racial preferences
was to ignore it. But that didn't work, because an irate Pete
Wilson threatened to fire UC President Richard Atkinson if he
didn't implement it. Atkinson reluctantly did, but then proceeded
to search for ways to lower standards and ratchet up
race-and-ethnicity based 'outreach' so that de facto affirmative
action could continue.
Governor Gray Davis has also done his part to backdoor racial
preferences. He devised an affirmative-action-by-other-means
program, which was installed this year, that guarantees admission
to a UC school to any student who graduates in the top 4% of his
class, no matter how academically sloppy the high school.
"It would no longer matter what school you attend. It would only
matter if you excel at the school you attended," said Davis when he
proposed the program. One kid, upon hearing of this egalitarian
handout, told the press, "I think there will be a lot of
transferring to where there isn't a whole lot of competition.
[Students] will just work the system."
Davis, reports the Los Angeles Times, recently attributed the
bolstered minority UC admissions to his program. He said it
required UC schools to accept more students -- "UC admitted 46,130
California high school seniors, a 10.4% rise from last year,"
reports the Times -- and it led to "significant increases in
students from rural areas and underrepresented minorities."
Dennis Galligani, UC's associate vice president for student
academic services, acknowledges that much of its outreach is aimed
at certain minorities and ethnic groups. Galligani, reports the
Times, "said that in the past two years, the university has spent
more than $250 million annually to help minority and
underprivileged students meet admissions standards. 'Certainly we
would like to believe the investment made in our outreach efforts
is paying off.' Galligani said."
Atkinson and the UC regents hope to weaken standards even more
in the near future. The SATs are "unfair" to minorities, says
Atkinson, who seeks to abolish them altogether as an element of the
admissions criteria. The UC system is moving toward "holistic"
criteria for admissions. Applicants will be rated according to a
"personal achievement score," which prizes not academic
achievements but accidents, such as socio-economic background.
What the Journal calls a "remarkable achievement" is nothing
more than a switch from overt affirmative action to covert
affirmative action. Pulling minorities up in the Golden State still
means pulling standards down.
About the Author
George Neumayr is a contributing editor to The American Spectator.