By George Neumayr on 4.3.02 @ 12:03AM
He'll pant and pander in every direction, if that's what it takes. But why does Gray Davis now want to give driver's licenses to two million illegals? Will he include insurance?
"I'm not asking people to marry me," California Governor Gray
Davis says. "I'm asking them to make a decision as to who they want
to govern this state."
Even Davis' self-deprecation is fake. Davis is in low-ball mode
because his polls ratings are so low. One out of three Democrats
view him unfavorably, as do two out of five independents, according
to recent polling.
California's Al Gore is simply seeking to neutralize his
negative image through a little contrived humility. Last month he
played the bragging veteran against the rookie Bill Simon; this
month he is the humble workman against the risky entrepreneur.
This "Yes, I am a loser, but at least I am competent "tack can
only work if Simon runs a feckless campaign. Davis knows that he
will lose if the race is a referendum on his acharismatic,
mismanaging governorship. So he is desperately trying to make
Simon's "extremism" the issue. Never mind that Simon's interest in
the so-called hot button issues -- affirmative action, abortion,
homosexual rights --is nil.
It is not Simon but Davis who displays the positions and
personality of an extremist. Davis has learned nothing from Richard
Riordan's "pro-choice" monomania, which made Riordan almost sound
like an abortionist, turning off even some liberal GOP women.
Davis is proudly hawking endorsements from extremist groups like
the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, and,
according to the Sacramento Bee's
Dan Walters, recently suggested that health-care companies make
morning-after abortifacients available without prescription.
Davis demands that Simon talk about abortion with the same level
of fervor as he does. Simon hasn't risen to the bait, causing a
nettled Davis and liberal California press corps to pout about
Simon's unwillingness to address the issues that "concern
Californians."
Shouldn't it concern Californians a little bit more that the
governor who has wasted billions of their tax dollars on energy
socialism wants to spend more of them on abortion?
Davis's extremism is seen on other issues. Pandering to the
Hispanic community, he recently announced his support for
legislation that would give 2 million illegal aliens the
opportunity to receive driver's licenses. Davis, in a typically
clumsy compromise, says the licenses should only apply to
"work-related" driving, leading Gil Cedillo, the assemblyman who
proposed the legislation, to say to the Los
Angeles Times, "I don't think people care whether a man is
driving to work, taking his family to church or to a medical
appointment."
Ever the Clintonian hedger, Davis struck the compromise so that
Californians won't label him a softie on anti-terrorism measures.
"I believe we can fashion a bill which gives people who have been
here for a while and are contributing to our economy the right to
drive to work, and does not compromise public security," Davis
said.
Isn't it a little extreme to suppose that people who broke the
law to enter the state will only drive legally to their jobs, then
pull over when headed for mischief? Davis's call to let illegal
aliens drive legally to their illegal jobs is about as moderate as
his support for letting illegal aliens pay $10,000 less at
University of California schools than out-of-state Americans.
Politics, not principle, is foremost in Davis' mind. The Los
Angeles Times reported
last week that Davis "received an additional $251,000 from
California's prison guards union earlier this month, only weeks
after the governor granted the officers a pay hike of as much as $1
billion and fulfilled their wish by proposing to close five private
prisons."
Prison guards will get a 33.76% phased-in pay raise, thanks to
Davis's sudden appreciation for their labor. Davis says he is
"philosophically" convinced that private entities can't measure up
to the state in building prisons: "If we learned anything from this
energy debacle, it is that private companies will do what's in the
interest of their shareholders, and sometimes those interests are
antithetical to the public. I see no reason why private companies
should be in the business of building prisons."
Yet Davis's own state audits, according to the Times, "have
given high marks to the five targeted private prisons," which
"house a combined 1,400 low-security inmates, most of whom have
been convicted of drug-related crimes."
Davis calls his state government an "above-board
administration." It is more like a reelection racket.
topics:
Business, Abortion, Law, Socialism, Energy