By Francis X. Rocca on 3.28.02 @ 8:44AM
You are what you drive, park, and leave in reverse.
"I love my Cadillac, and Cadillacs are the hippest cars," says
TAP's own
Ben Stein in an interview in this morning's Washington Post:
"The BMW is a car for the person who wants to make it; the Cadillac
is the car for someone who already has made it. And by the way, I
didn't see Elvis Presley driving around in a Mercedes."
I've never owned a BMW, a Mercedes or a Cadillac, so I can't
claim to be an expert on the subject. Then again, that allows me to
be objective. I doubt I could ever bring myself to buy a car as
pricey as any of those three, but if I had to choose, I'd
definitely go for the Caddy, if only because of its blatantly
luxurious image. There's nothing more coy than a status symbol
designed to look understated.
The only car ever registered in my name was a 1981 Mazda 626,
which I bought third- or fourth-hand in '88 and managed to keep
running for almost two years. It amazes me to think how many
thousands of miles I got out of it, including a summer trip from
Washington, D.C. to New Mexico and back. One day (ominously enough,
the day I showed up in a dreary new town to start the ordeal of
graduate school), the transmission finally disintegrated. Good
thing I was a member of AAA, so I didn't have to pay for towing it
to a local dealer, who took the wreck off my hands for nothing.
No one would have called that car hip, at least not the way it
looked by the time I owned it: the driver's-side door had been
stripped of its paint during rust removal, and a long arc had been
scratched into the windshield by a worn-out wiper. Yet I took a
twisted pride in driving it around, especially to fancy occasions.
If I ever needed reassurance that I hadn't sold out to the yuppie
values of my college friends, all I had to do was pull up to a
five-star hotel and hand the valet parking attendant the keys to my
clunker.
Yet in my conceit, I now realize, I was no less vain than a
middle-aged dentist cruising in his Porsche, or an inner-city kid
obsessively waxing his lowrider Impala. I simply had a different
image I wanted to project.
This gradually became clear to me during my car-less days in
academia, a milieu at least as snobbish as any other, though
typically in ways that invert the standards of the outside
world.
I remember seeing the historian Hugh Trevor-Roper (Lord Dacre of
Glanton) shock an audience of civilians by lecturing in a suit that
looked as if it had been tailored between the wars, and not pressed
or mended since. So graceful and self-assured was Lord Dacre's
bearing -- to say nothing of his characteristically brilliant
lecture -- that the palm-sized grease stain on his jacket might as
well have been a decoration from the Queen.
Shabby dress has been a point of pride for English scholars
since the Middle Ages, whereas American academics, in their comfort
shoes and corduroy jackets, are usually just plain dowdy. Yet Yanks
adhere no less rigidly to the rules of anti-fashion. And since
America is the land of the automobile, this attitude is especially
clear in regard to cars.
The literary critic Stanley Fish, who regards most of his
colleagues in higher education as masochists, has called the Volvo
the perfect academic car, since it's costly without being
attractive. I once heard an American professor mock his "gross"
neighbors by noting that he was the only man in town who didn't
drive an Italian sports car. Which efficiently conveyed the
information that he lived in an exclusive area yet remained morally
and aesthetically above it all.
Italy, where I now live, is another country with a car cult, not
only because it's home to Ferrari and Lamborghini, but because real
estate here is so scarce, most people live in apartments that
middle-class Americans would mistake for walk-in closets. A flashy
set of wheels has the same importance for the typical Italian man
as a well-appointed kitchen has for his wife: it's the Holy Grail
of the consumerist quest.
Being a devout contrarian, I've grown all the more opposed to
fancy cars since I moved here. Our dinky three-door Citroën is
registered in my wife's name, and if I ever buy a vehicle myself,
it will be small enough to navigate and park with ease on narrow
medieval streets. But I've had to renounce my sense of superiority
on this point, now that there's someone around to dispel it.
"Really," I asked my spouse the other day, trying yet again to
convert her to my way of thinking, "isn't there something laughable
about wasting money on a car? Isn't it pathetic showing off that
way to strangers? Don't you have more respect for a man who treats
an automobile as simply a way to get from here to there?"
"Not necessarily," she said. "It might mean that he's more
concerned with other things. On the other hand, it might simply
mean that he's cheap."
topics:
Education, Sports